A major topic of discussion was the management of public records and the oversight of the city manager. Council members expressed concerns about the lack of proper systems to retain electronic communications, such as text messages, which are essential for complying with public records laws. The council debated the implications of not having an archiving system in place and the resulting challenges in retrieving important communications. A council member highlighted the need for a protocol to prevent the immediate resetting of phones, which could lead to the loss of public records. The lack of record-keeping raised questions about accountability and transparency within city management.

The council also discussed the financial performance of the city’s EV charging stations, which had incurred significant costs without generating expected revenue. The city spent $111,000 on the program, but only $4,582 in revenue was generated over the last year. Despite a slight increase in usage during tourist seasons, the overall performance remained lackluster. A council member noted the marginal profit of $90 after accounting for operational expenses, excluding electricity costs. The debate centered on whether the EV charging program was a sustainable investment, given its current financial trajectory.

A council member suggested creating a comprehensive analysis of the financial data, including a detailed spreadsheet to track revenues and expenses over time. It was noted that there was confusion regarding the number of chargers, with reports mentioning both six and twelve chargers, which needed clarification. The council acknowledged the need for accurate data to assess the viability of the chargers and determine whether the program could eventually break even or if discontinuation was a more prudent decision.

The council also examined the operational challenges related to EV chargers, such as the installation of chargers at the port that were subsequently disconnected due to safety concerns. This added another layer to the discussion about the practicality and safety of maintaining such infrastructure.

Another issue discussed was the handling of code enforcement policies, particularly regarding unfiled liens that had financial implications for the city. The council debated the authority and decision-making of the code enforcement officer responsible for the oversight. Council members expressed frustration over the failure to record a lien ordered by a magistrate, which affected the city’s ability to collect fines and secure its interests. This lapse in procedure resulted in a property being sold without the buyer having to address the lien, highlighting the need for improved oversight and accountability in code enforcement.

The council discussed the importance of maintaining records and ensuring timely filing of liens to prevent similar situations in the future. There was a call for a reassessment of the policies and practices concerning record-keeping and code enforcement to enhance accountability and transparency.

The meeting concluded with a recognition of the ongoing efforts to address these issues, with commitments to continue monitoring the financial performance of the EV chargers and the management of public records. The council agreed on the importance of establishing clear guidelines and ensuring that city employees understand their responsibilities regarding public records and code enforcement.