The award, given annually to a public school leader, acknowledged her efforts to ensure that all students, regardless of background, have access to opportunities. Dr. Hines expressed her deep connection to this mission, noting, “I do take the work that I do to heart because every day I look at the individual young people that doors are closed before them.” Her commitment to creating an inclusive educational environment resonated throughout the meeting.

The meeting also featured an update from the special education design team, which has been working on Phase One of their initiative to create equitable learning environments. The team shared their commitment to challenging systemic racism and supporting the unique strengths of all students, particularly those in special education. They highlighted their efforts to gather feedback through surveys and focus groups.

Fiscal matters were another focal point, with the presentation of the fiscal year 2024 audit results. Auditors from MMKR, who recently merged with LB Carlson, delivered an unmodified opinion on the district’s financial statements. However, they identified issues with timely and accurate cash reconciliations and compliance with invoice payment statutes. Some invoices were not paid within the required 30 days, a recurring problem in previous audits. The board discussed the importance of documenting reasons for payment delays and the implementation of a new online form to improve oversight and compliance.

The finance advisory committee recommended increasing the fund balance target to 12-15%, up from the current floor of 6%. Revenue per student has increased, attributed to property taxes, state aid, and expanded free meals programs. Despite these positive indicators, the need for careful budget management remains, with plans for a $2 million reduction in expenditures in the coming year.

The meeting also explored the district’s budgeting process, focusing on the general fund, which comprises nearly 80% salaries and benefits. Rising inflationary pressures on these costs necessitate strategic budget cuts. The board has utilized various budget balancing tools, including fund balance usage and specialized revenue sources. Historical spending decisions, while beneficial in the short term, have contributed to the need for future cuts, especially as general revenues have not kept pace with expenditures.

Board members expressed concerns about the gap in state funding and the limitations imposed by state law on local property tax revenues. The district’s financial situation is further complicated by potential reductions in revenue from state proposals. Increased enrollment is expected to boost revenue, but external influences on public education financing remain a challenge. The board emphasized the importance of community engagement in advocating for public education funding.