The focal point of the meeting was the proposed changes to the Land Development Code, a comprehensive document that has been under review for several years. Residents expressed apprehension about several aspects, including the impervious surface ratio, digital signage regulations, and the potential impact on local businesses and neighborhood aesthetics. Concerns were also raised about the difficulty of accessing information, with many attendees stating they had only recently been able to review the extensive document due to technical issues with the city’s website.

One resident, echoing the sentiments of many others, highlighted the issue of digital signage, arguing that the proposed frequency of updates—every 30 seconds—could lead to visual clutter. The resident suggested a more thoughtful approach to digital signage regulations, citing past attempts to address the issue that had not reached a satisfactory conclusion. The discussion on digital signs also touched on the broader topic of communication between the city and its residents, with suggestions for improved transparency and accessibility of information.

Concerns about the proposed regulations for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were also prominent. Residents questioned the potential for these units to exacerbate existing parking issues and their possible use as short-term rentals, which could disrupt neighborhood stability. The Council clarified that ADUs would be permitted only in multifamily zoning districts under specific conditions.

The meeting included a proposal to delay the first reading of the new ordinance until March, allowing for a public workshop to be held on February 20. This workshop aims to gather further community feedback and provide clarity on the proposed changes. The Council acknowledged the need for a comprehensive Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document to address common queries and improve communication with residents.

Additionally, the Council discussed the intricacies of the 317-page LDC document, with some members expressing the need for a red-line version to help residents understand the changes better. However, concerns were raised about the potential confusion from unverified documents, preferring instead to rely on official documentation prepared by professionals.

Outside the LDC discussion, the Council addressed the agreement with the Volunteer Life Saving Corps (VSC) for ocean rescue services. The partnership was praised for its operational success, despite some concerns about the reduction in rescue boards. The Council unanimously approved the amended agreement, emphasizing the importance of adequate equipment for lifeguard training and response times.

In another urgent matter, the Council approved an emergency sanitary sewer repair on Republic Drive, estimated not to exceed $31,988. The Public Works director detailed the necessary repairs to address a crack in the storm sewer, with concern for residents potentially affected by the repair process.

The meeting also covered updates on outdoor dining regulations, with discussions about maintaining capacity at 75% and the challenges of interpreting the development code’s language. The Council acknowledged the need for clearer communication regarding these regulations.