At the forefront of the meeting was the contentious issue surrounding the Soen House, the oldest house in Natick, with discussions focusing on Mass Audubon’s firm stance on proceeding with its demolition. One board member expressed regret over the situation, noting the significance of the house’s legacy despite the non-original state of its remaining structure. The board explored alternatives, such as salvaging architectural elements and relocating them to a public space where they could be more accessible to the community. Mass Audubon’s willingness to salvage and store historically significant items was acknowledged, but restoration was deemed unfeasible.

In light of this, the board considered involving Natick Heritage in efforts to preserve the house’s legacy through displays and fundraising for future exhibitions. A suggestion was made to utilize surplus funds to cover the costs of storing salvaged items, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts between the town and Mass Audubon to safeguard historical artifacts.

Parallel to this debate, the board addressed an appeal from a resident over a high water and sewer bill. The resident, Ms. Norcross, shared her personal and financial struggles, including a stage four breast cancer diagnosis and her efforts to manage her family’s home. She argued that her water usage, primarily for lawn maintenance, should not incur sewer charges, as the water did not enter the sewage system. The board explored potential solutions, such as installing an irrigation system that would separate water usage from sewer charges. Although a rebate was considered, it was limited due to her consistent usage patterns.

The board expressed sympathy for Ms. Norcross’s situation, discussing the availability of assistance programs and suggesting a continuation of the hearing to allow her time to seek financial relief from the tax assessor’s office.

The meeting also delved into the proposed fiscal year 2026 budget and an $8 million operational override. The board reviewed the town’s capital program, which outlines projects necessitating funding. Concerns were raised about the implications of the override’s potential failure, which could stall planned projects and limit financial resources. The discussion stressed the importance of maintaining fiscal sustainability and the need for clear communication regarding the override’s impact on the town’s financial health.

Board members contemplated establishing an “override stabilization fund” to mitigate future financial uncertainties, drawing on models from other towns. This fund would act as a financial buffer, distinct from existing stabilization funds designated for operational and economic downturns. The board also considered revisiting outdated policies and exploring measures to support seniors through means-tested tax exemptions.

In addition to financial concerns, the board addressed amendments to the town’s alcohol policy, focusing on training requirements for individuals handling alcohol. The policy mandates in-person training for first-time certifications, though logistical challenges were noted. The board acknowledged the need to reassess this requirement to ensure it does not impose undue hardship on local establishments, proposing a review after a year to evaluate its impact.

The meeting concluded with updates on compliance with the MBTA Communities Act and personnel changes within the town’s public works department. The board also announced an upcoming override forum, encouraging community participation and engagement in ongoing discussions.