The conversation around ADUs was a focal point as state legislation now mandates more permissive standards for these secondary housing units, challenging Amherst’s existing local bylaws. The state aims to facilitate the creation of ADUs by minimizing regulatory hurdles, which contrasts with Amherst’s current approach that includes specific occupancy limits and dimensional setbacks. A board member expressed comfort with the existing bylaw, which accommodates both special permit and by-right ADUs. However, concerns were raised about whether these restrictions could withstand state scrutiny.

The board considered the option of adding a preamble to clarify that the local bylaw is supplementary to state law, preventing confusion for those navigating the regulations.

A significant concern emerged regarding the impact of ADUs on student housing, with discussions touching on whether limiting ADU units to non-student renters could reduce the attractiveness of such developments. Some members argued for a more inclusive approach that aligns with broader housing goals. A proposal to modify the definition of student homes in relation to ADUs was also debated, with suggestions that it could enhance the regulatory framework.

The board’s conversation extended beyond ADUs to broader zoning issues, including the proposed change to footnote M, which affects density calculations for additional dwelling units. The historical context of footnote M was discussed, emphasizing a shift from a 6,000-square-foot requirement to 4,000 square feet, and the potential need to revert to the original standard to maintain community character and prevent overcrowding.

There was a recognition that any proposed changes must reflect the community’s needs, with a commitment to creating a diverse and sustainable housing environment.

The topic of density also led to discussions about potential developments along North Pleasant Street, where the board considered zoning flexibility, public engagement strategies, and the implications of ownership structures on redevelopment. Members debated whether to focus on residential apartments or incorporate mixed-use elements, noting the complexities of increasing density while maintaining the character of surrounding areas.

The meeting also covered updates on site plan reviews and applications, including proposals for solar canopies and development projects requiring multiple hearings. While these topics were addressed, the primary focus remained on the implications of ADU regulations and broader zoning reforms.