The board’s budget discussion revealed deep concerns about fiscal constraints, which are reportedly tighter than in the past decade. A preliminary budget increase of $1.6 million over the previous year, translating to an approximately 11% rise, was highlighted. Concerns centered on underfunding in areas such as substitute teachers and fixed costs. These budget challenges are exacerbated by previous underfunding and ongoing contractual negotiations, including costs associated with insurance. The members voiced a need for strategic planning to address these financial pressures, emphasizing the importance of collaboration with the school committee to navigate the tight budgetary landscape.

Another issue discussed was the design and funding for a traffic light at Bridge Street, with estimated costs reaching approximately $3 million and design expenses alone ranging from $225,000 to $300,000. The board emphasized the necessity of this project to alleviate potential gridlock during peak hours, which poses safety concerns for emergency vehicle access. Discussions also touched on easements, which have faced delays since 2019, contributing to the urgency of this infrastructure project.

In addition to these major topics, the board explored the potential “de-enterprising” of the parks, underscoring collaboration between the finance team and the Parks Department. Emphasizing the need for a joint effort, the board planned a meeting with the Parks Commission to discuss budgetary practices for Enterprise accounts and indirect costs. The intention is to ensure that any future decisions regarding the parks are made with comprehensive input and data.

The board also considered broadband expansion, particularly Verizon’s proposal for fiber optics. While some members expressed skepticism about the need for expansion, there was recognition of potential benefits for underserved residents. A proposal for a letter of support for Verizon was contingent upon further information to prevent negative impacts on local cable access.

Further discussions during the meeting included a code of conduct for town officials. This code would provide guidelines for interactions among board members and town officials, though questions about enforcement and the board’s authority over elected officials were raised. The conversation acknowledged increased tension among members since 2020.

The board also addressed infrastructure needs, such as the possibility of running a water line down Route 18, and the implications for traffic management, including a potential stoplight. These discussions were part of broader considerations for the new fire station, with the committee’s next meeting scheduled to present construction bid documents and explore funding opportunities to offset costs.

Additionally, the meeting touched on the Municipal Vulnerability Program, noting the town’s non-compliance status and the potential for Action grants to support safety and environmental improvements, particularly for fire stations near flood zones. The board’s first meeting on February 4 was positively described, highlighting effective collaboration and initial task focus.

In terms of procurement and transparency, the board discussed improving the visibility and accessibility of Requests for Proposals (RFPs) for local projects. Members agreed to enhance the town’s website and utilize social media for announcements to prevent missed bidding opportunities. Maintaining a record of interested parties was emphasized to manage amendments and ensure fair access to information.

The meeting concluded with various subcommittee updates, including the Select Board Policy Subcommittee’s review of policies such as ambulance billing and the number of constables. The need for updated and relevant policies was acknowledged, with particular attention to weather-related procedures for closing town hall.