The meeting opened with a discussion about the role of the newly appointed ADA coordinator, Eric Dera. The focus was on clarifying the complaint process related to ADA compliance. It was agreed that initial complaints should be directed to Eric, with the option to escalate matters to the Assistant Town Administrator, and ultimately the Attorney General’s office if necessary. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of information on the town’s webpage, with one participant unable to determine the format of the provided documents, highlighting the need for better accessibility.

The board delved into Eric Dera’s credentials, revealing his prior experience managing ADA compliance in an apartment complex. There was a suggestion to appoint Henry as the assistant coordinator, emphasizing his potential role in enforcement. This led to a broader discussion on the procedural hierarchy between the ADA coordinator and the Building Commissioner, with an emphasis on resolving issues locally before escalating them.

A motion was made to revise the language in the ADA policy documents to ensure they accurately reflect town procedures and safeguard compliance efforts. This motion was unanimously approved, paving the way for the documents to be submitted to the Select Board for final approval. The conversation underscored the importance of clear communication and defined roles to prevent misunderstandings in ADA enforcement.

The board also discussed the mandatory training requirement for members, expressing concern over the lack of updates on alternate formats. However, it was assured that there was no immediate risk from not completing the training. The timeline for grant documentation submission was set for May 2025, with participants emphasizing the need for thoroughness and adherence to advisor Jeff’s recommendations to avoid processing delays.

Another topic was the town van dispatch system. One board member shared negative personal experiences with the service, noting similar complaints from other users. This revelation was surprising to some, as these issues had not been previously reported. Liz Trecc, who was informed of these complaints, found them unexpected. The board agreed to involve the Council on Aging for an update and tasked Amy D. Michelle with investigating the matter further. They planned to revisit the issue in the next meeting to discuss any findings.

Additionally, the meeting addressed potential changes to the committee roster, focusing on Luigi’s lack of participation. Multiple attempts to contact him had been unsuccessful, leading to a motion to petition the select board for his removal. This motion was approved, and efforts to include this matter in the next select board meeting agenda were discussed.