The council grappled with the state’s decision to limit cannabis retail licenses to 150 across the state, raising concerns about whether Cook County would secure any licenses. The potential impact on local businesses was a focal point, with discussions highlighting the challenges smaller local enterprises might face against larger chains. A sentiment was expressed that local entities should be prioritized, with one participant emphasizing a commitment to ensuring that larger retailers do not overshadow local businesses. This concern spurred a dialogue on the possibility of establishing a merit-based system to prioritize local applicants, although there was acknowledgment that such a system would require careful planning to avoid complications.

Attention also shifted towards the role of micro businesses, which are not capped by state law, offering a potential avenue for local entrepreneurs. The council explored how micro businesses could engage in various activities, such as cultivation and retail, and how they might fit into the local regulatory framework.

The council also considered zoning laws as a tool to regulate the placement of cannabis businesses, following examples from other cities like Alexandria and Detroit Lakes. By establishing clear zoning regulations, the council discussed maintaining some control over the local market.

In parallel, the council examined the broader regulatory landscape, including the possibility of setting a zero limit on cannabis businesses if neighboring counties already accommodate sufficient numbers. This aspect of the conversation drew comparisons with cities such as Two Harbors in Lake County, where population limits have influenced the number of allowed cannabis businesses.

The meeting also touched on the city’s relationship with the Cook County Chamber of Commerce. The council discussed a proposed service agreement to collaborate with the chamber’s lobbyist on issues related to the wastewater treatment plant. The agreement, valued at $5,000 annually over five years, aims to bolster the city’s presence in legislative discussions and secure funding opportunities. Concerns about accountability and communication with the lobbyists were raised, highlighting the need for regular updates on lobbying efforts and outcomes. The council stressed the importance of building relationships with legislators and emphasized the need for transparency and results from the chamber’s lobbying activities.

Another topic addressed was the city’s emergency preparedness, particularly in response to power outages. The council discussed identifying reliable emergency shelters and the necessity for backup power solutions. The community center was proposed as a potential site for providing warmth and shelter during emergencies. Issues with generator reliability during previous storms were noted, prompting conversations about infrastructure improvements, such as managing tree growth affecting power lines and exploring potential FEMA funding for resilience projects.

Lastly, the council briefly reviewed ongoing projects and community engagements. Reports included updates on the North House Folk School’s board retreat, which focused on their budget process and summer plans, and progress in lease negotiations with the school. The approval of an art project by the Park Board was also mentioned, with a request to expedite its discussion in the next meeting.