0:01The library has seen a notable uptick in the usage of Hoopla, a digital platform that operates on a pay-per-use basis. In January alone, the library incurred a monthly bill of $520, attributed to the increased number of patrons utilizing the service. Currently, users can check out up to 12 items per month, but the board is contemplating reducing this limit to seven or eight items. This proposal aims to balance budget constraints with maintaining user satisfaction. Concerns were raised about the potential impact of this change on user experience, with one trustee expressing reluctance to reduce access, stating, “I hate to see it go.”

17:14To offset the reduction in checkouts, the board discussed promoting “bonus borrows” during specific promotional periods, which would allow users to access more materials at no additional cost. Additionally, the introduction of alternative digital platforms like Libby was considered, offering patrons other options should Hoopla’s limits be adjusted.

0:01The meeting also highlighted the library’s ongoing short-staffing issue, which has delayed specific projects and initiatives, including the Community Preservation Committee (CPC) project. Given the current staffing situation, progress on the CPC project is impeded, with a revised application submission tentatively scheduled for March or April. However, if deadlines are missed, the board may need to wait until September for the next opportunity.

17:14Another agenda item was the discussion of fundraising efforts for the library’s outdoor space. A proposal suggested a fundraiser in honor of local figures Charles and Irene Wolf, which could involve dedicating a bench or plaque in their memory. The board expressed interest in this initiative, provided it aligns with existing funding agreements. They emphasized the importance of ensuring no conflicts with the current funding contract with the CPC, which has already allocated resources for the outdoor project.

In addressing the outdoor space project, logistics and timelines were key considerations. The board recognized that delays could lead to increased costs and emphasized the urgency of progressing with the project. They discussed the possibility of local businesses contributing resources or labor to minimize additional expenses, highlighting the value of community involvement in bringing the project to fruition.

The board’s attention then shifted to upcoming budget hearings, scheduled for either March 1 or March 8. Members stressed the importance of attending these hearings to advocate effectively for the library’s needs. The presentation of infographics at these hearings was deemed critical, as they provide a clear visual representation of the library’s usage statistics and financial necessities. The board aims to demonstrate the library’s value to the community, noting that 36,000 patrons visited the library in the past year, with a monthly average of 3,000 visitors.

0:01In addition to these discussions, the board reviewed the library’s collection development policy, particularly in light of ongoing debates about book banning and challenges. Amendments were considered to reflect current practices, including updating the residency requirement for checking out specific materials.

The library’s winter and spring programming plans were also briefly mentioned. Notable events included a musical instrument petting zoo, a balloon twisting story time, and adult crafting sessions. Future collaborations with the Greater Westfield Chamber of Commerce were noted, with the library planning to participate in a health fair in May and a senior center open house in June.