The most pressing topic at the council meeting was the discussion about withdrawing from a state agreement related to a controversial project that has drawn public concern. The proposed project involves sand extraction from designated areas, which could potentially reduce the width of the beach, a concern echoed by community members and council members alike. The council acknowledged that feedback from constituents has opposed the project, with no residents reportedly supporting it. Consequently, the council is considering a resolution to formally withdraw from the agreement, a decision that will be addressed in the next meeting.

During the discussions, there was an acknowledgment of potential repercussions from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should the council decide to withdraw. One commissioner highlighted the need to prepare for any unfavorable reactions from the DEP, emphasizing the borough’s historical compliance with regulations despite occasional human errors. The dialogue underscored the importance of responding to public sentiment and prioritizing the community’s interests in municipal decision-making.

In addition to the central issue of the state agreement, the council explored various capital projects, including the Bayside bulkhead replacement and flood mitigation improvement project. Progress was reported on the underground storage system piping and bulk replacement, with ongoing efforts to minimize the impact on the public and property owners. The Municipal Building bathroom improvement project is advancing without major issues, while the reconstruction of Toledo Avenue remains on schedule for completion before summer.

Another discussion point was the allocation of approximately $1.1 million from the Boardwalk Preservation Fund for the fishing pier’s improvement. However, uncertainty looms over the Army Corps of Engineers’ involvement and the use of state funds, as the pier’s condition has deteriorated since its construction in 2006. The council faces a decision on whether to renovate or rebuild the pier, with a deadline to utilize the grant funds by 2026.

The meeting also touched on budgetary matters, with the introduction of the local budget for fiscal year 2025. A commissioner assured the public that the budget had been thoroughly vetted and agreed upon by all commissioners, highlighting transparency and fiscal responsibility. The public safety budget, which includes various services such as the police department, EMS, and volunteer fire department, was discussed, with a focus on maintaining stability and addressing necessary spending areas. The budget adoption meeting is scheduled for March 26, where the public is invited to participate and raise questions.

Further discussions included ongoing projects and improvements, such as the Municipal Building renovations and considerations for a new addition to the police facility. The council emphasized the importance of involving department heads in discussions about their needs, including storage and restroom facilities, to ensure efficient planning and avoid unnecessary expenses.

The council also addressed the need for enhancements in bike safety and the potential for larger-scale projects to improve bike paths. Additionally, the 250th birthday committee reported no new volunteers, though a recent presentation on local history was noted as successful.