The most pressing topic was the potential impact on local traffic due to the new recreational facility. Residents expressed concerns over increased congestion, particularly at the intersection of 41st Street and 11th Drive, as well as potential issues at the US1 and 41st Street intersection. The proposed site plan includes several recreational features such as tennis, paddle ball, and pickleball courts, alongside a spa and fitness center. Despite these amenities being well-received, the public’s main worry was the strain on existing road infrastructure.

Council members assured the public that traffic studies had been conducted, and any necessary road improvements would follow to accommodate increased traffic flow. They noted that all projects must meet concurrency requirements. The center’s parking provision, calculated based on various facility uses, was also discussed, with council members explaining how different activities typically result in overlapping use of parking spaces.

The meeting also touched on noise and lighting concerns, with assurances given that these factors would be managed according to county ordinances. The council emphasized that the recreational center and the neighboring Riverton residential project would likely self-regulate these issues to maintain good neighbor relations.

The council addressed a question from a constituent regarding another development, Vero Largo, and its water management practices. The claim that Vero Largo could pump water from retention ponds into canals was raised but required further investigation, as it seemed unlikely to be true according to council members.