The meeting’s focal point was the proposal for a 20-unit development at six Baro and Precinct Street, currently housing an equestrian facility. Developers plan to maintain the facility, although horse numbers may decrease from the current 40 to 50. The existing house on Precinct Street will remain due to tax considerations. Proposed as a friendly 40B development, the Selectmen have shown preliminary support, suggesting further exploration, including a potential 40Y application. Homes are planned to be smaller, with footprints between 1,350 to 1,380 square feet and typically featuring two-car garages, targeting first-time buyers or families with lower to mid-level incomes. Lot sizes would vary from a quarter to a third of an acre, each equipped with its own septic system, and municipal water accessible at the street.

Safety improvements are planned with the reconfiguration of Route 79 to enhance site access. The roadway design extends between 1,250 to 1,300 linear feet, accommodating the three-bedroom units. Developers assured the board that the site is not in a nitrogen-sensitive zone, so no nitrogen-related restrictions apply.

Board members questioned the feasibility of the proposed starter homes, with developers conceding a full pro forma was yet to be conducted, acknowledging community reception as crucial. Queries were raised about the layout and buffering, particularly regarding the potential need for additional buffering near the Myck Street area. Developers confirmed most of the equestrian facility will remain, and about 30 acres will be preserved for wildlife, addressing local concerns.

Pauline Robello, a resident, voiced concerns about wildlife preservation, receiving assurances from developers that only a small section of the property would be developed. The board sought clarity on infrastructure management, with developers undecided on whether a single developer would handle both infrastructure and construction. The debate on independent versus shared septic systems ended with a preference for individual systems for efficiency.

In contrast to the new development, the board also addressed a special permit petition from William Hoffman for modifications to a dwelling on Marold Lane. The request involved constructing an addition porch and expanding the front deck on a non-conforming lot. The right side setback would reduce from 26.5 feet to 10.6 feet, and the front setback from 15.6 feet to 6.5 feet. The fire department highlighted access limitations, stressing that modifications should not worsen existing conditions.

The Board of Health required a two-bedroom deed restriction, given the existing septic system design. Clarifying parking concerns, it was proposed to modify the driveway for front parking, accommodating two cars. Nearby residents supported the proposal, emphasizing it would enhance neighborhood character. After deliberation, the board approved the plans, with conditions including the deed restriction and fire code compliance.