The primary focus of the meeting was Amazon’s request to reconfigure the existing parking area to better accommodate trailer storage. The proposed changes included converting a portion of the parking spaces into a trailer storage yard, segregating empty trailers from active loading operations. However, the board scrutinized the plan heavily, emphasizing the need for compliance with the town’s parking space width standards and traffic safety regulations.

A critical point of contention was the proposed width of the trailer parking spaces, which Amazon suggested be reduced to ten feet. This sparked debate as Cranbury’s standard for trailer parking is 15 feet. The applicant argued that the narrower width was justified due to the nature of the operation, where trailers are parked without active loading or unloading. However, board members expressed concern over deviating from established standards, worrying about the precedent it might set for future developments.

Key testimony was provided by an architect engaged by Amazon, who explained the necessity of an overflow yard to store empty trailers, which would relieve congestion at the loading docks and improve traffic flow. Nonetheless, concerns persisted regarding the overall safety and potential impact on traffic patterns. The board’s traffic consultant stressed the importance of ensuring adequate buffer zones between moving vehicles and the proposed fencing, emphasizing the need for a minimum nine-foot separation to prevent damage during vehicle movement.

The detailed examination of traffic flow also spotlighted the potential increase in truck traffic resulting from the modified parking configuration. Members of the board sought clarity on whether the proposed changes would lead to an uptick in truck activity or merely streamline existing operations. Amazon representatives assured the board that the goal was to enhance efficiency rather than increase capacity, maintaining existing operational hours without extending truck movements beyond current levels.

Safety concerns were further accentuated by the proposed security fencing around the new trailer parking area. The necessity of extensive fencing was questioned, particularly in landscaped areas that posed little risk of vehicular intrusion. However, the board suggested incorporating reflectors on the fence to enhance visibility and mitigate potential hazards.

The discussion also delved into the practicality of pedestrian safety measures, particularly the use of planters versus bollards to protect pedestrians near the warehouse entrance. Members debated the effectiveness of existing planters. Public input was solicited, with residents voicing concerns over the adequacy of the proposed changes, particularly in light of past traffic studies that they felt were outdated.

In addition to addressing the immediate safety and operational concerns, the board highlighted the necessity for a comprehensive traffic study to understand the broader implications of the proposed modifications on local infrastructure. The study would provide crucial data on traffic patterns.

The meeting concluded with administrative matters, including the appointment of a new board secretary, Gina Hill, following a farewell to the outgoing secretary. The board also discussed forming a zoning committee, expressing gratitude to volunteers committed to the initiative, and emphasizing the importance of community involvement in planning processes.