The meeting opened with the Van Dijks’ proposal to build an addition to accommodate their growing family. The request for variances was due to the irregular shape and topographical challenges of their lot, created in 1933. The proposed addition aimed to provide a functional entryway and a master bathroom, designed to blend with the existing architecture of the house.

Attorney Marian McEttrick, representing the Van Dijks, conveyed that the neighbors on Lantern Lane, represented by Trustee Nancy Nukem Freights, opposed the variance due to potential impacts on property resale value. Freights highlighted her responsibility to honor the wishes of the late former owner and uphold the interests of the estate, despite acknowledging the Van Dijks as amicable neighbors.

Architect George Toas elaborated on the design considerations, emphasizing efforts to minimize the intrusion into setback areas and maintain harmony with the neighborhood’s character. Despite these considerations, the existing offer on the neighboring property was contingent on the variance not proceeding, leading to the Van Dijks’ decision to withdraw.