The most prominent agenda item was the renovation project on Plumbush Downs, which lies within 100 feet of a salt marsh. This proposal primarily sought to extend the structure upward without expanding its footprint, an approach that was revised following feedback from the commission. The applicants, Tammy Prine and Margaret Wallace, presented updated drawings which included enclosing a front porch to create a roofed space and replacing non-compliant brick with native shrubbery and seagrass. They also proposed a gravel area to house propane tanks, addressing concerns about potential buoyancy issues during storms. The elevation of these tanks was of particular concern given the floodplain location, and the applicants confirmed compliance with building department recommendations.

The commission engaged in a thorough dialogue, focusing on structural implications and the sufficiency of existing supports for the new roof. It was confirmed that existing steel piles would suffice, negating the need for additional supports. The discussion also covered the proposed use of coastal native plants, as part of the special conditions imposed along with the elevation of propane tanks. A motion for a negative determination was approved, with one member abstaining due to absence from the prior meeting.

Another discussion revolved around a request for determination on Northern Boulevard, where the applicant, Jim Williams, sought to replace a previously existing deck and add a bluestone walkway. This project faced scrutiny due to its location in a velocity zone and the potential for the bluestone to act as a projectile during storm events. Jim Williams argued that bluestone would be more stable than the former wooden deck. The commission raised concerns regarding the proposed four-inch elevation of the deck, questioning its compliance with safety regulations and its connection to the existing structure. Clarification was sought regarding the specifics of the project, with a site visit proposed to better understand the conditions and changes.

The meeting then shifted to enforcement orders, noting no updates as all were pending completion of work or awaiting the growing season. The public hearings commenced with the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s notice of intent for ecological restoration at the William Ford Wildlife Management Area. This involved invasive plant control and habitat restoration efforts. The commission discussed the methods, particularly the use of foliar spraying and cutting for bittersweet vines, and emphasized the importance of monitoring and reporting. The project required a five-year order of conditions due to its long-term nature.

The discussion also touched on access to treatment areas, with the feasibility of using a marshmaster being researched. Diane, a commission member, expressed support for the project while advocating for thorough monitoring. The commission unanimously approved a motion to include special conditions, such as erosion control measures and annual reporting, with the requirement that any additional restoration methods receive commission approval.

The final major topic was the demolition and reconstruction project on Northern Boulevard. The applicant had made changes to address a neighbor’s concerns about the health of an adjacent dune. These changes included moving the house closer to Northern Boulevard, requiring zoning board approval. The project would replace an existing dwelling and part of a driveway with a new elevated structure, reducing the total impervious surface area by removing pavement. Restoration plantings were proposed to compensate for disturbed natural dune vegetation.

A public comment from an attorney representing neighboring property owners emphasized the dune’s importance and urged the commission to ensure construction methodologies protect the dune. The commission planned a site visit to assess the situation, emphasizing the need for staking building corners near the dune. A consensus was reached to continue the hearing following the site visit.