0:00The loss of equalization aid was attributed to adjustments in the calculation of local share, which is determined by property values and district income. The state’s new method, using three-year averages for property values and district income, increased the local fair share, thus disqualifying Cherry Hill from receiving this critical aid. This change impacts the district, where the local share now exceeds the adequacy budget, resulting in a funding disparity that complicates budget planning.

The board expressed frustration with the lack of transparency in the state’s funding calculations, highlighting the challenges in securing necessary funding for the upcoming fiscal year. The board’s presenter emphasized the disparity in funding due to the state’s altered financial approach, which affected 275 out of 576 districts, down from 398 the previous year. The financial ramifications include cuts to stabilized aid and a drop in preschool funding, further straining the district’s budget.

21:38The proposed budget contemplates a $6.5 million deficit, prompting discussions on potential areas for cuts. Initial trims in operational areas, supplies, and equipment proved insufficient, leading to considerations of more significant reductions, such as eliminating permanent substitutes and reducing educational services acquired through outside contractors. Personnel cuts are also on the table, although efforts are underway to minimize impact through attrition, retirements, and resignations. The potential elimination of 19 non-teaching support positions was noted, with a focus on avoiding reductions in force.

The board also discussed the potential reconfiguration of the middle school to a junior high school model. This change could offer cost efficiencies and address class size issues, which remain a concern for the district. The junior high model would provide greater predictability in class sizes, potentially alleviating challenges at certain schools. However, the implications for educational programs and support systems, particularly in music and special education, necessitate careful planning and community engagement.

39:05In response to the budgetary pressures, the board outlined a strategic planning process that aligns financial allocations with district priorities. This process includes examining all budgetary components, such as busing and utility efficiencies, and evaluating spending against district goals. The board acknowledged the uncertainty of future state aid, emphasizing the need for long-term solutions rather than relying solely on tax increases.

1:51:06Public comments during the meeting echoed concerns about funding and educational policies. Community members urged the board to advocate for fair funding, particularly for at-risk and special education students. The reduction in aid for at-risk children was highlighted as a issue, with calls for mobilizing community efforts to counteract years of underfunding.

1:31:32The board also addressed policy matters, including the review of Policy 5512 on HIV and Policy 5701 on academic integrity. Additionally, the meeting included acknowledgments of community events, such as school performances and participation in the Read Across America initiative, reflecting ongoing community engagement despite financial challenges.