Longmeadow School Committee Reviews ELL Program Compliance, Anti-Semitic Incident at Williams Middle

The Longmeadow School Committee meeting on March 11, 2025, addressed issues affecting the district, including a review of English Language Learner (ELL) program compliance following a Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) audit, and a troubling incident of anti-Semitic graffiti at Williams Middle School. Additional discussions covered community engagement, remote meeting policies, and school choice allocations.

0:01The primary focus of the meeting was a detailed presentation on the district’s practices for English Language Learners (ELL), led by Nilda Arari, the director of student and family support. This presentation followed a recent DESE compliance audit, which is conducted every six years. The audit process involved extensive data collection and interviews with various stakeholders, including parents, administrators, and ELL educators. The audit revealed that Longmeadow’s ELL program was largely compliant, with no areas of zero compliance. However, it highlighted opportunities for improvement, particularly in the registration process and the frequency of interim assessments to better monitor student progress.

Nilda Arari emphasized the district’s use of an immersion model for ELL students, who learn alongside their peers with support from SEI-endorsed teachers and targeted ESL instruction. The audit recommended expanding translation and interpretation services during school events to improve communication with families. Additionally, it suggested the development of individualized learning plans for ELL students, similar to those for students with IEPs or 504 plans, to document assessment scores and preferred learning strategies.

16:57The discussion on ELL support also included the integration of student data into PowerSchool to provide families easier access to their child’s records. The potential use of Panorama for progress monitoring was explored, which could track academic achievement, attendance, and behavioral data. This integration aims to support risk identification and monitor student success after exiting the ELL program.

The committee also addressed the need for SEI endorsement training for educators, available remotely through Westfield State at no cost, to ensure teachers are well-equipped to support ELL students. Communication preferences among families were discussed, with a particular focus on leveraging technology to facilitate effective outreach and engagement.

33:46In an equally serious discussion, the committee addressed an incident of anti-Semitic graffiti discovered in a restroom at Williams Middle School. The local police are assisting with the investigation, and the committee underscored the necessity of ongoing professional development and resources to combat discrimination within the schools. This incident prompted a broader conversation about fostering an inclusive and respectful environment for all students and staff.

Additionally, the committee received updates on student activities, budgetary matters, and the middle school building project. The finance subcommittee reported a lower deficit projection for the district and discussed adjustments to grants and special revenue budgets, noting increases in Title II and MECO grants. A motion to approve these budget revisions was passed unanimously.

The committee also considered school choice and METCO slots for the 2025-2026 school year, recommending the acceptance of three METCO students at the kindergarten level and three school choice students at fifth grade, based on enrollment patterns. This decision was made with confidence that it would not impact existing staffing or services.

52:55A discussion on remote participation policies highlighted the upcoming expiration of current provisions for remote meetings. The committee was advised to consider adopting a policy similar to the select board, which allows remote participation under certain conditions while requiring a quorum, including the chair, to be physically present.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: