Lakeville Planning Board Faces Transition with Town Planner Resignation Amidst Ongoing Development Deliberations

The Lakeville Planning Board meeting on March 13, 2025, was marked by discussions on local development projects and zoning considerations, alongside the announcement of Town Planner Nancy Dery’s resignation.

1:16:39One notable issue at the meeting was the resignation of Nancy Dery, the town planner. Her impending departure was described as a considerable loss to the board, with members expressing apprehension about the future of planning leadership in Lakeville. There was a collective sentiment of disappointment and concern over finding a suitable replacement, given the importance of maintaining effective oversight and communication in the town’s planning processes. To address the transition, the board discussed the possibility of retaining Dery in a consultant capacity to leverage her expertise during the interim period. Additionally, the suggestion of conducting an exit interview was proposed to facilitate a smoother handover. The board recognized the potential for a protracted search for a new planner and emphasized the value of continuity in handling ongoing projects.

0:01Simultaneously, the board delved into an array of development plans, notably the site plan review for a proposed 13,300 square foot building on Harding Street by Lex Development Inc. The proposal, which included driveways, parking areas, and utilities, required further deliberation due to the late submission of documentation. The board highlighted the necessity for comprehensive peer review and examination of outstanding issues, such as compliance with architectural design standards and local regulations. Concerns were also raised about the lack of feedback from the Board of Health and the fire department, prompting a motion to continue the hearing to March 27, 2025, to allow additional time for review.

The meeting also covered potential development plans for Lakeville Golf Course, with Derek Maxia leading discussions on creating a master plan for the property. Maxia proposed forming a collaborative group consisting of planning board members, residents, and other stakeholders to explore feasible options for the site, which included industrial and residential proposals. This initiative reflects a broader community engagement strategy in Lakeville, emphasizing the importance of public input in shaping the town’s development.

43:17In another discussion, the board tackled updates to the zoning map, a critical tool for guiding development in Lakeville. Despite existing inaccuracies, the new map was recognized as an improvement in clarity and accessibility. To enhance public engagement, a suggestion was made to post the updated map on the planning board’s website, accompanied by a necessary disclaimer regarding its accuracy. The board agreed on sending a thank-you note to a student who contributed to the mapping project, acknowledging their valuable input and potential for future collaboration.

1:16:39The meeting also addressed procedural elements, such as revisiting the stormwater bylaw with legal counsel due to recent amendments affecting enforcement. A public hearing was scheduled for April 10 to finalize documents for submission to the select board. The board emphasized adhering to legal deadlines to ensure compliance and avoid delays in implementing necessary changes.

1:32:13Additionally, the board discussed the potential formation of an Economic Development Committee by the select board post-election. Concern was raised over the absence of a planning board representative in this new committee, leading to the proposal of sending a memo to express interest in inclusion.

Finally, the board reviewed the status of solar projects, notably on Crooked Lane. The tracking of these bonds was deemed critical, with updated documentation now held by the treasurer and accessible to the accounting office. Concerns about the health of screening trees for the solar project were raised, prompting discussions on future bonding requirements for landscaping maintenance to preserve the area’s aesthetics and environmental integrity.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: