A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the proposed construction of a two-story single-family dwelling on Morris Avenue, spearheaded by applicant Sachin Patel. The project required bulk and use variances due to the property’s insufficient lot depth and its proximity to a major gas line. The site, located in an RB residential zone, was to include a garage, concrete driveway, patio, and porch, with utilities readily available. However, the proposed structure’s proximity to a 75-foot gas buffer zone was a concern for board members, who highlighted the potential risks of building near infrastructure.

Donna M. Bullock, a licensed professional engineer representing the project, outlined the site’s characteristics and the variances needed. She assured the board that the design complied with the zoning criteria for setbacks but acknowledged the challenge posed by the gas line running along Morris Avenue. Bullock confirmed that the proposed structure would be just 26 feet from the gas line, raising the board’s apprehension about safety and the need for documentation from the gas company. Consequently, the board decided to carry the case over to May 20, 2025, allowing time to secure necessary clearance from the gas company and ensure preventive measures during any excavation work.

The second major case involved Big Fish 1918 LLC’s application to convert the second floor of an existing commercial building on Lincoln Highway into two one-bedroom apartments. The property, located in the General Business (GB) Zone, typically prohibits residential use, prompting the need for a use variance. Lawrence Sachs, the applicant’s representative, outlined the minimal site changes proposed, which included some landscaping and the addition of residential parking signage. The proposed apartments would utilize existing utilities, avoiding any need for further excavation and thus bypassing potential safety concerns related to gas lines.

Laura Totton, a professional engineer, confirmed site details such as the 12,500 square foot lot, existing parking, and handicap space. The absence of digging requirements reassured the board. Despite the residential use being atypical for the area, the proposal was framed as an adaptive reuse of space that aligned with the township’s comprehensive master plan. The plan encourages diverse housing options to address low vacancy rates, a point emphasized by professional planner Colleen McEr. She highlighted the project’s compatibility with the surrounding mix of residential and commercial properties, noting that the proposal would contribute to smart growth by offering housing near amenities and public transport.

McEr argued that the project would advance the municipal land use law, with benefits outweighing any potential detriments. The board expressed interest in the project’s integration into the community, particularly regarding the variance for a reduced side yard setback. The applicant proposed attractive landscaping as a mitigation measure. Questions arose about the condition of existing structures, such as a deteriorating fence, with the applicant expressing willingness to undertake repairs.

Following a period of public comments, where no objections were raised, the board unanimously approved the application, contingent on conditions such as the fence repairs and maintaining the basement as non-habitable space. The decision was supported by the assertion that the applicant met both positive and negative criteria for approval, and the site was deemed suitable for the proposed mixed-use.