Cherry Hill School Board Grapples with Budget Cuts and Transition to Junior High Model

The recent Cherry Hill School Board meeting was dominated by discussions on the 2025-2026 budget, the potential transition from a middle school to a junior high school model, and concerns about funding allocation and its impact on student services. The board examined the challenges of balancing fiscal responsibility with educational priorities amidst declining state aid and increasing operational costs.

20:18The most pressing topic was the proposed budget cuts and their implications for the Cherry Hill School District. The district faces a $3.7 million budget cut that could lead to the elimination of numerous support positions, including mathematics coaches and interventionists. This reduction could increase class sizes and reduce administrative staff, echoing budgetary constraints faced during the 2009-2010 school year. The district has already trimmed approximately $1.5 million from non-educational areas and vacant positions, but a net reduction of $6.5 million is necessary to balance the budget. Concerns were raised about the connection between staffing levels and student achievement, particularly in mathematics, and the ongoing learning loss attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.

One aspect of the budget discussion was the shift from a middle school to a junior high school model, a significant structural change that could offer financial savings while providing students with greater exposure to peers and departmental rotation. The board underscored the need for careful planning to ensure that sixth graders, many of whom had disrupted early learning experiences due to virtual education, receive adequate support during this transition. Committees are being formed to develop a new schedule and model for middle school that considers both existing students and incoming sixth graders, with a focus on maintaining educational quality without compromising fiscal responsibility.

55:30Community members expressed anxiety about budget cuts impacting students requiring additional educational support. Jennifer Nadio highlighted the struggles families face in obtaining evaluations for Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) or 504 plans, questioning whether proposed changes, such as the removal of the advisory period, would exacerbate these challenges. Concerns about the adequacy of funds for students transitioning to middle school were echoed by Renee Robinson, who emphasized the need for support programs to ensure a smooth transition for incoming sixth graders.

The preschool budget also drew attention, with community members questioning its sustainability given the district’s financial constraints. Jeff Potowitz, a community speaker, argued that the aid the district is expected to receive is insufficient, while others like Laurie Neary critiqued the state funding formula for failing wealthier communities. Skepticism about the long-term viability of relying on state funding for preschool was prevalent, with some advocating for a focus on core academics for K-12 students instead.

1:32Amidst these concerns, the board acknowledged the importance of strategic budget planning and the alignment of financial decisions with educational outcomes. The discourse emphasized the need for transparency and community engagement as the district navigates these financial challenges, with several members expressing appreciation for the community’s input and the clarity of the budget presentation.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: