One focus of the meeting was the proposed lease agreement for the Harter Hall golf course, which would transition its management from city oversight to private control. Representatives from Harter Hall outlined a plan to relieve Sebring of the financial burdens associated with the golf course, which has historically operated at a loss. The proposed lease is seen as a way to revitalize the course, aligning it with the resort’s vision and enhancing its appeal as a destination.

Brian Sykes, an attorney for Harter Hall, emphasized that the lease would allow the city to retain ownership of the land while transferring operational responsibilities to the tenants. This move would allegedly alleviate the city’s financial losses, which amounted to $515,437 according to recent data. Sykes assured that the golf course would remain an amenity linked to Harter Hall, potentially boosting its status as a resort destination. Robert Blackman, representing the ownership group, echoed these sentiments.

The proposal faced scrutiny from council members and the public. Concerns were raised about the long-term implications of the lease, particularly the potential for a 99-year term and unresolved drainage issues affecting surrounding neighborhoods. Some council members expressed hesitation to approve the lease without thorough understanding and discussion of these implications. The need for a workshop to address these concerns and explore options collaboratively with the Blackman group was suggested.

Community members also voiced apprehensions during the public comments segment. Victor Vietro criticized the abrupt notice given to the operators of Catty Shack restaurant, who have maintained a long-standing presence at the golf course. Sonia Mendoza, co-owner of Catty Shack, detailed their financial commitment and loyalty over 18 years, expressing frustration at the uncertainty surrounding their lease termination. Other speakers, like Joey Lang and Dr. [Name], emphasized the importance of keeping the golf course as a municipal asset, arguing for its role as a community hub and warning against alienating local residents.

The council’s discussions highlighted a broader debate over the balance between private development and public access. Some community members argued for maintaining affordability and accessibility to recreational facilities, while others saw the potential benefits of private management in improving the quality and financial sustainability of the golf course.

In addition to the golf course lease, the council addressed zoning changes for a property owned by the Masonic Lodge at the intersection of Home Avenue and Sebring Parkway. The proposed change from R1 residential to C1 commercial zoning raised concerns about potential undesirable uses. Public commentary underscored the need for transparency and specific plans from prospective buyers before approving zoning changes. The proximity of a church under construction and its implications for alcohol sales on the property were also discussed.

The council further deliberated on legislative matters impacting local governance, focusing on Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) funds, property tax exemptions, and bills affecting local control. Concerns were raised about the financial implications of a proposed property tax exemption, which could result in significant revenue loss for essential services. The council emphasized the need to monitor legislative developments and their potential impact on local government operations.