Jen Beam, the borough planner, provided an in-depth overview of Bradley Beach’s affordable housing obligations, explaining the process and the borough’s move into the compliance phase. The borough has been working to meet its requirement of 13 affordable housing units amidst challenges such as limited developable land. Beam outlined the use of a “vacant land adjustment” to manage these obligations, noting the borough’s land capacity factor is recognized as zero, complicating new development. The borough has filed necessary resolutions, with no objections to its assigned numbers during the challenge period, allowing it to focus on compliance before the June 30 deadline.

Significant discussion centered on financial responsibilities, including the allocation of funds for rehabilitation programs. The borough must earmark a portion of its trust fund balance for affordability assistance and project revenues from building permits, a process described as uncertain. The borough’s spending plan may require amendments as circumstances evolve, drawing comparisons to successful strategies in nearby communities.

Public comments brought attention to the borough’s financial oversight. Concerns were raised about the borough’s 53 bank accounts, double the previously stated number, and the lack of tracking or reconciling these accounts. Residents questioned the transparency and recordkeeping practices, referencing prior council meetings where similar issues were discussed. One resident highlighted discrepancies in financial management, urging the council to address these concerns and maintain accountability.

The meeting also touched upon the borough’s zoning and housing obligations, highlighting the need for a solid agreement with an adjudicator and the importance of meeting the compliance plan submission deadline to avoid lawsuits. Public questions raised the issue of prior obligations from a previous housing cycle, with discussions on how best to proceed with affordable housing in the borough.

The council discussed infrastructure improvements, notably a planned “road diet” for Memorial Drive, reducing lanes and adding bike lanes to secure funding. This project includes installing a traffic light and high-visibility crosswalks, with construction proposed for 2027. Public safety and accessibility were also addressed, with plans to improve wheelchair access to beaches through wider mats and designated drop-off spots.

In addition to housing and infrastructure, financial matters were scrutinized. The borough’s financial practices came under fire, with public comments about perceived corruption and mismanagement. Concerns were raised about financial allocations to local projects and the handling of federal COVID-19 funds. The borough’s Chief Financial Officer’s loss of his New Jersey license added to the concerns over financial oversight.

The council addressed resolutions, including shared service agreements with Neptune City for recreation programs and prisoner detainment. Public comments also highlighted concerns about the demolition activities and the resulting dust pollution, emphasizing the need for knowledgeable inspectors and improved construction practices.

The meeting concluded with discussions on local governance and community involvement. Public service announcements detailed enhancements to transportation services for seniors and disabled residents, while updates on the library board’s search for a historical restoration consultant were provided. The council also acknowledged community contributions, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and responsiveness to resident concerns.