The dock expansion on Main Road, presented by Cherry Stone Realty Trust, involved constructing a fixed pier, gangway, and floats in the Westport River. The commission’s discussion revealed complexities due to an existing dock already occupying the property. The proposal aimed to extend the dock to accommodate two residences, with modifications ensuring compliance with updated regulatory requirements for float height. The proposed expansion was minimal, and assurances were given that it would not encroach upon nearby properties, as neighboring property owners had been notified and raised no objections.

The commission’s approval of this project was contingent upon receiving a file number and comments from state agencies.

In parallel, the commission also evaluated the repair and maintenance of an existing stone revetment seawall at the same Main Road property. The proposed modifications involved raising the seawall by approximately one foot to mitigate flooding and erosion risks. The design incorporated a sloped structure to enhance stability and provide habitat for marine life, maintaining repairs within the existing licensed plan. Concerns about adequate drainage behind the wall were raised, emphasizing the need to prevent erosion and damage from wave action. This proposal, like the dock expansion, awaited comments from state agencies and was contingent upon a pending file number. The commission’s unanimous approval underscored its support for measures aimed at enhancing coastal resilience.

A significant portion of the meeting focused on the ongoing Blue Cat Pine Ridge Estates project at 46 to 52 Gulf View Lane. The commission expressed concerns about a lack of communication from involved parties, leading to the decision to continue the matter until April 29. This project raised questions about jurisdiction, as a resident highlighted ambiguity regarding oversight by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (Mass DEP) versus local authorities. The commission clarified that local approval was required before any state appeals could be pursued.

The conversation touched upon the project’s implications for local water supply and septic systems, with concerns about potential groundwater impact from high-density housing development. The commission highlighted the necessity of securing feedback from the Board of Health to ensure compliance with public water supply regulations.

Another notable topic was the proposal for a septic system repair on Sylvia’s Lane. The proposal involved installing a new 2,000-gallon septic tank and leech field, adhering to a 100-foot buffer from the river. The commission emphasized the need for Board of Health approval before proceeding. The proposal received unanimous support, contingent upon meeting all regulatory requirements.

The commission also considered an application for rebuilding a shed and conducting beach maintenance on East Beach Road. The applicant sought to carry out beach nourishment activities using compatible materials to the existing grain size. The commission supported the application, emphasizing the need for similar maintenance on neighboring parcels. The approval was granted for three years, with the possibility of extensions, highlighting the commission’s focus on sustainable coastal management.

Additional discussions included a project on Union Street proposed by Simmons Concrete. This involved replacing a gravel area with a concrete pad, introducing an impervious surface of 2,126 square feet. The proposal incorporated a planting mitigation area, exceeding a one-to-one replacement ratio, to enhance the riverfront’s ecological value. The commission welcomed the project’s compliance with performance standards and highlighted the importance of removing a chain link fence to improve wildlife passage.

Finally, a proposal for constructing a cement slab on Sandpiper Drive, presented by Paul Joncas, was discussed. The slab’s location was adjusted to comply with property line setbacks, and the commission approved the request unanimously.