Paul Myola, serving as the executive director of the GIF, presented an overview of the current state of the insurance fund. He detailed the financial pressures stemming from a 56% increase in reinsurance costs and a 17% rise in medical costs related to workers’ compensation claims. Myola explained that legislative changes have made first responders eligible for workers’ compensation benefits if they contracted COVID-19, costing the Joint Insurance Fund approximately $25 million, with $800,000 attributed to the local GIF. He also highlighted a legislative trend allowing employees to reopen compensation claims up to two years after their last medical treatment, potentially adding $2.3 million to local budget expenditures.

The presentation underscored the financial efficiency of the GIF, which operates with administrative costs under 10 cents on the dollar, compared to other funds that operate at 20 cents. Myola emphasized the GIF’s strong financial standing, with a surplus over $14 million and recent dividends of nearly $730,000 returned to members in the past year. He outlined various value-added services including safety and risk management training, a cyber risk management fund, and environmental liability coverage, all designed to meet member needs. Myola also discussed the Tulip Program for liability coverage when outside organizations use municipal facilities, along with updates to insurance requirements for vendors and contractors.

A focus was placed on the GIF’s adaptability, particularly in response to climate change and natural disasters, which have increased property claim costs. The council was informed of the ongoing financial repercussions and the importance of programs like cyber risk management, which incentivizes municipalities to enhance cybersecurity measures. Discussions on the transitional duty program highlighted efforts to reintegrate injured employees into the workforce, thereby reducing disability costs.

The meeting then shifted to a discussion on trash collection services, sparked by 168 resident complaints regarding missed pickups and damaged property since March 2023. Council members debated the introduction of new trash carts and the associated financial and logistical implications. Concerns were raised about the affordability and accessibility of larger trash carts for senior citizens, with one member questioning the feasibility for seniors to handle 96-gallon bins. The operational efficiency of trash collection was discussed, with a push toward adopting automated systems that could offer long-term cost savings.

The council considered bids from three companies for trash collection services, noting that while some proposals were more expensive than the current contract, they might offer improved service quality. Some members suggested exploring options such as offering smaller bins for those unable to manage larger sizes, and establishing drop-off stations for excess waste.

Transparency in the decision-making process was emphasized, with residents seeking access to bid proposals for review. The council acknowledged the need for further deliberation before making a decision.

In addition to these major topics, the council addressed the approval of vouchers and routine consent agenda items, while a public comment segment saw resident Heather Kelly raising concerns about unaddressed issues with curbs and paving work on her property. The council assured her of follow-up actions, highlighting ongoing community feedback and engagement.