The meeting’s primary focus was the fiscal year 2026 budget proposals, emphasizing the need for clear communication with residents regarding potential tax impacts. The board considered two budget scenarios: a level service budget and a balanced budget, each with distinct fiscal implications. The level service budget, if adopted, would result in a $383 increase in the average single-family tax bill, whereas the balanced budget would involve a $150 increase. The board acknowledged the necessity of an override for the level service budget, which would lead to a $300,000 deficit if not approved, potentially triggering a special town meeting to address the shortfall. Discussions revealed a preference for maintaining operational levels without further cuts, reflecting concerns over the sustainability of reducing school funding.

Amidst the budget deliberations, the board faced challenges with utility coordination, particularly concerning double poles in the community. Members expressed frustration with utility providers’ lack of responsiveness, a common issue affecting many municipalities. The discussion centered on the need for accountability among utility companies, as the town often finds itself managing the coordination process. The complexities of dealing with multiple companies were evident, with one individual noting, “our TA shouldn’t be chasing it… the utility provider should… it’s just a chronic problem everywhere.” This sentiment underscored the burden placed on local governments to ensure timely and efficient utility work.

The National Grid pole installation hearing on River Street was another significant agenda item. A representative from National Grid outlined plans to install a midspan pole to facilitate three-phase power delivery for a new residential development. Concerns were raised about potential solar installations, given the trend in nearby developments. While National Grid confirmed that future homeowners could opt for solar systems, there were no immediate plans for such installations in the new development.

Additionally, the board explored ongoing issues with pole removal coordination at the intersection of Groton Street and Cross Street. A selectman voiced frustration over delays in removing an old pole, which had become a safety hazard due to equipment transfer challenges involving National Grid, Verizon, and Charter Spectrum. The representative from National Grid clarified that the company’s responsibility was limited to setting new poles and transferring its own equipment, with other companies responsible for their respective equipment. This highlighted the logistical hurdles municipalities face when coordinating utility work involving multiple stakeholders.

The meeting also touched on a special election proposal regarding a budget override. Participants expressed concerns about the override’s implications, particularly its potential impact on community services like the library and police department. The use of free cash to address budget shortfalls was debated, with opinions diverging on its effectiveness. Some advocated for maintaining stabilization funds to provide a buffer in challenging fiscal times, while others questioned the long-term viability of relying on free cash.

As the discussion concluded, the board emphasized the importance of community engagement and transparency in the budgeting process. Plans were made to present the proposed budget at the town meeting, with an override vote scheduled for the annual election. If the override failed, a special election would be held to vote on a reduced budget. The board underscored the need for residents to understand the budget’s implications, advocating for clear communication to ensure informed decision-making.