One item at the meeting was the decision on the district’s vision statement. The board was presented with three options and ultimately selected “A world-class district centered on students, driven by results” with a 6-1 vote. This decision came after debate over the implications of each option. Some board members expressed concerns about the need for aspirational language that aligns with the district’s goals, while others preferred the original statement for its directness.

In addition to the vision statement, the board explored financial scenarios for the 2024-2025 school year. Discussions revealed a projected budget cut of approximately $4 million, necessitating reliance on the fund balance to offset rising costs. The board reviewed five financial scenarios to align with the recently approved budget. A significant concern was the declining enrollment, which impacts revenue projections. The board also examined inflationary factors, such as a 6% increase in transportation costs and a 10% hike from Excel Energy, incorporated into budget forecasts.

The proposed levy, set to be voted on in July, was another focal point. The board discussed how to communicate the inflationary factor to voters, as past surveys showed only 8% support for a $45 monthly levy. The demographic shift towards empty nesters in the community was noted as a potential influence on perceptions of the levy. The board acknowledged the need to balance community expectations with the financial realities of providing educational services.

Behavior management was also a topic. The board reviewed behavioral data across all school levels, noting improvements due to the addition of full-time Deans at elementary and middle schools. This has enhanced the district’s ability to track and address behavior incidents effectively. The presentation emphasized the importance of context in understanding behavior incidents, with separate classifications for elementary, middle, and high schools. The introduction of the Educ Climber system was praised for improving data tracking.

The board also discussed legislative changes that prohibit suspensions for K-3 students, requiring non-exclusionary discipline methods. The board explored how to categorize and report incidents like a child throwing a chair within this framework. Adjustments to cell phone policies were noted to have positively impacted behavior management, particularly at the middle school level.

In addition, the board evaluated Superintendent Dr. Michael Thomas, who met or exceeded expectations. The evaluation emphasized the need for continuous improvement in academic achievement and staff morale. Dr. Thomas was encouraged to enhance community engagement and be more present in schools.

The meeting concluded with a focus on future policy changes, such as the cell phone and dress code policies, set for review in the coming months. The board agreed to schedule a study session instead of a retreat, allowing for public recording and additional agenda items. Communication protocols were also discussed, with an emphasis on timely interaction with the community.