The meeting opened with significant delays as the Select Board struggled to reach a quorum due to the chair’s absence. Once convened, a key agenda item was the scheduled poll hearing concerning the installation and relocation of utility poles on North Street. This hearing aimed to address a petition under Provisions 166 of the general laws, involving both the replacement of existing poles with taller ones and the relocation of several others. However, the validity of the hearing was called into question when it was revealed that the notifications sent to abutters were based on an inaccurate list, with some individuals having moved. Due to these notification issues, the decision was made to postpone the hearing, with suggestions to reschedule it for three weeks later, avoiding conflicts with upcoming holidays.

In a session characterized by resident participation, George raised concerns about plumbing issues at the Old Town Hall. He provided a detailed account of a meeting with a plumbing inspector and a plumber from Chester, highlighting necessary repairs such as the installation of a tamper-proof spigot, addressing drainage issues, and fixing a leaking sink. Cost estimates for these repairs totaled approximately $2,000. George inquired about the availability of funds within the maintenance budget and discussed the possibility of reallocating funds if necessary. The board agreed to revisit this subject at the next meeting to determine the official funding allocation.

Further complicating matters, George expressed dissatisfaction with the town’s fiscal policy adherence, particularly the lack of quarterly financial reports from the treasurer, as required by town policy. He emphasized the need for these reports for financial oversight and accountability. The board responded by stating that such reports were not mandated by state law, leading to a debate over the town’s policy implementation. George pressed for clarity on the town’s investment reports. The board acknowledged the confusion but suggested that George direct his inquiries to the town treasurer, Sarah Hunter, for specific financial details.

In a follow-up on community infrastructure, members discussed a potential mutual aid agreement for sharing equipment between towns. The discussion included past experiences with equipment lending and the potential benefits of borrowing rather than purchasing equipment outright. The board considered consulting legal counsel to draft an agreement that would ensure reciprocity and fairness. In parallel discussions, insurance matters were addressed with a new representative from Maya Insurance, potentially resolving outstanding financial issues.

The meeting also covered updates on community involvement, notably contributions from recruits of the Hampton County Sheriff’s Office in town upkeep efforts. Logistics concerning the disposal of collected leaves prompted further discussion with town staff members.

Discussions on infrastructure explored the feasibility of using Town Hall to house the fire department, concluding that existing options had been exhausted. An informational session for the community was proposed to discuss alternative properties for the fire station. Meanwhile, the registration of a Council on Aging vehicle was confirmed, needing only a final seal before completion.

Financial matters arose again when the Board of Health requested $5,000 to settle two outstanding project-related bills. Concerns about budget compliance and procedural approval steps were raised.

The Select Board’s agreement with Rainey for training purposes under Massachusetts General Law chapter 41 sections 107 and 23 was another focal point. The agreement involved Rainey’s compensation of $1,150 per week until June 30, with questions regarding the contract finalization and public disclosure. The funding source for Rainey’s payment was confirmed as the highway budget, and a public hearing announcement was made concerning land acquisition by the Department of Conservation Recreation.

A resident inquired about the tax implications of the land acquisition, specifically the potential increase in taxes, which was not confirmed. Concerns about land use restrictions were also voiced, emphasizing the need for transparency and public access to information.

The meeting concluded with the introduction and approval of two candidates for employment in the highway department, with both candidates discussing their qualifications. Following a formal vote, Mike Carr and Ryan were hired, with start dates set for early April.