School funding emerged as one notable issue, with several residents, educators, and parents voicing their opposition to proposed budget cuts. The cuts threaten to eliminate core teaching positions, counselors, and special education services, raising fears about the potential decline in educational standards. One speaker questioned the logic of reducing these positions, stating that such actions would dramatically alter the school culture and diminish educational quality. The risk of families opting for private or charter schools due to these cuts was highlighted, with concerns about the long-term financial impact on the public school system.

Members of the Amherst School Committee and Regional School Committee stressed the need for thoughtful and equitable resource allocation. They called on the council to prioritize funding for schools to prevent further harm to educational services. One speaker underscored the difference between equality and equity, criticizing the council for not fully understanding this distinction. The sentiment was echoed by several educators who emphasized the importance of investing in education as a means to preserve the town’s reputation and property values.

In addition to school funding, the council faced scrutiny over the Jones Library renovation project. Residents expressed skepticism about the project’s financial viability, with concerns about cost overruns and the potential burden on taxpayers. The project, estimated at $46 million, was criticized for not addressing more immediate community needs, such as school funding. Questions were raised about the library trustees’ ability to meet their fundraising commitments, with fears that additional financial obligations could strain the town’s budget.

The meeting also included discussions on a proposed overlay district along University Drive, aimed at expanding housing and economic opportunities. The proposal, which includes mixed-use buildings, faced some opposition over concerns that it might prioritize student housing over other types of housing, such as those for seniors or workforce members. Council members debated the potential impact on existing commercial services and emphasized the need for a balanced approach to development that considers diverse housing needs.

The council addressed a motion to reject an amendment to the regional school district agreement, concerning the assessment method for fiscal year 2026. The proposed amendment, which aimed to cap assessment increases or decreases at 6%, was met with resistance over fears it would disproportionately shift financial burdens onto Amherst taxpayers. The council ultimately rejected the amendment, with arguments that maintaining the existing assessment method would ensure fair contributions based on the number of students each town has in the school system.

The financial discussions extended to the town’s capital and operating budgets, with debates on whether to adjust the capital stabilization fund from 10.5% to 10%. The proposed adjustment aimed to provide financial flexibility and potentially enhance funding for schools. Some council members expressed concerns about the long-term implications of reducing the capital guideline, emphasizing the importance of maintaining robust funding for infrastructure projects.