A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to a housing proposal targeting an increase in affordable housing. The proposal, which includes up to 124 units, seeks to address the town’s affordable housing deficit, with 25% of the units earmarked as affordable. This initiative aligns with local standards and has already been reviewed by the Affordable Housing Trust and the Community Housing Committee. Discussions emphasized the need to maximize affordable housing opportunities, particularly given the availability of a 70-acre parcel of land that could bolster the town’s subsidized housing inventory. The unique nature of the subsidized housing inventory allows all units in a rental building to be counted towards the inventory, even if only a portion are affordable.

Concerns about the capacity of the town’s wastewater treatment plant were raised, given that housing developments require significant sewer resources. There was discussion about the potential capacity increase to around 750,000 gallons per day, which would necessitate collaboration with the state Department of Environmental Protection to ensure proper management. The board highlighted the importance of these infrastructure considerations in supporting the proposed housing developments.

In tandem with housing discussions, the board addressed economic development opportunities along Route 28. The potential for partnerships with developers was highlighted, emphasizing the strategic use of the town’s existing assets to attract investment. The idea of developing a sports complex alongside residential units was proposed as a way to combine economic growth with housing solutions. However, zoning restrictions in the B3 district, which limit certain commercial activities, were identified as potential barriers to development. The board recognized the need for zoning changes to enhance the viability of projects along Route 28, particularly with proposed sewer infrastructure improvements.

Design standards for Route 28 were another focal point, with debates over whether these standards should be mandatory or advisory. The goal is to enhance the area’s aesthetic appeal without deterring potential businesses. The board expressed the sentiment that encouraging architectural design positively, rather than through rigid mandates, could foster a more business-friendly environment.

The meeting also revisited the topic of plastic use regulations, specifically a petitioned article related to plastic use in local businesses. Concerns were raised about the practicality and enforcement of this bylaw, prompting discussions on the need for more time to develop feasible solutions with vendors. The board advocated for early engagement with town staff by those considering petitioning, to ensure that proposals align with existing bylaws and reduce potential misunderstandings.

Additionally, the board received updates on community projects, such as the sale of boardwalk planks for the Pockets River Landing project, which has generated significant revenue. Progress on the boardwalk’s construction was acknowledged, along with plans for a community meeting to discuss the hazard mitigation plan and gather public input.

The need for clear, objective action items within the LCP was reiterated, with particular attention to organizing these items to facilitate future grant applications. The board discussed the importance of integrating comprehensive studies and findings into the LCP, recognizing potential gaps in information by its completion. They also highlighted the significance of coastal resiliency and stormwater regulations within the plan.