Deerfield Select Board Grants Pole Petition Amid Resident Concerns Over Property Impact

At a recent Deerfield Select Board meeting, the board approved a pole petition from Verizon New England and Eversource Energy to erect a series of poles on Lower Road, with community members voicing concerns about how the project would impact their properties. The board also addressed a senior housing proposal, the finalization of a solar project lease, and ongoing budget discussions.

02:19The pole petition hearing captured attention as it involved installing new, sturdier poles to support a higher voltage standard of 138,000 volts. The infrastructure improvements were aimed at enhancing the reliability of service, particularly during harsh winter conditions. Representatives from Eversource and Verizon, including Edward Yusadi and Gilberto Silva, outlined the project’s scope, which included replacing existing poles with more durable class one and two poles. The upgrade necessitated the addition of midspans to accommodate the heavier wires, intended to reduce outages caused by tree damage.

06:41Residents voiced their concerns during the hearing, with Joseph Haynes and Ed Wong, both from Lower Road, questioning how the changes would affect their properties. Haynes sought clarity on whether the new infrastructure would impact his land less than the current setup, particularly regarding the management of trees under the poles. He was informed that while electric poles would move to the roadside, communication poles would remain in their current location within the tree line, causing some confusion.

13:36Ed Wong raised issues about the power and communication lines running through his property, noting the absence of a formal easement. He sought assurance about the possibility of relocating the communication lines alongside the new electric infrastructure. The board advised Haynes to provide his contact information to the assistant town administrator to coordinate further communication with Verizon.

22:21The board approved the pole petition unanimously after confirming details about a separate agreement to relocate a pole ten feet north of its current position. The board committed to maintaining communication with residents about ongoing changes.

28:39Beyond the pole petition, the board discussed a senior housing proposal at the former St. James Church rectory on North Main Street. Lely Dwight presented information about an RFP for the project, emphasizing the importance of community input in evaluating proposals. Dwight, drawing on her experience in senior housing development, suggested committee members who could provide technical expertise and represent community perspectives. The board approved the committee’s formation, with a balanced mix of members to ensure effective assessment and alignment with community needs.

37:42In other developments, the board reported on the finalization of lease documents for the Nex Amp solar project at the town landfill. The project is projected to generate approximately $6.1 million over 20 years, contributing to the town’s capital stabilization fund. This financial opportunity was met with enthusiasm from the board.

41:49Budget discussions also took center stage, particularly concerning the allocation of opioid settlement funds totaling around $85,000. The board is exploring options for using these funds, with the Valley Regional Health Collaborative working on a plan. The aim is to involve the health agent in decision-making to ensure the funds are used effectively.

25:57The meeting also highlighted preparations for the Western Mass Summit, scheduled for May 3rd, featuring various speakers and workshops to engage local planners and community members. The board expressed enthusiasm for the summit, emphasizing the importance of community participation in the upcoming annual town meeting. Arrangements for child care and additional seating were planned to encourage attendance.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: