One of the most notable cases discussed involved a proposal for a six-unit townhouse development on Metropolitan Avenue. The applicant, represented by Jennifer Ha from HU Architecture, presented plans for a project designed to maximize the property’s use while maintaining consistency with the surrounding residential area. The site, measuring 12,928 square feet, is zoned for single-family use but sits adjacent to a commercial zone. The proposal includes three two-bedroom units and three three-bedroom units, all with individual access and a total of 11 parking spaces. The board raised concerns about the parking configuration, noting that the surface parking occupied much of the usable open space. While no prior discussions with the planning department had occurred, the applicant was open to feedback.

Public testimony confirmed that an abutters meeting had no attendees, though the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association offered a neutral stance, allowing the proposal to progress. The board unanimously approved the motion, with a condition for planning department review to address the parking setup and improve open space.

Another case involved adjustments to a project on Liverpool Street. This proposal sought modifications to previously granted variances, including an increase in building height and a reduction in required parking spaces. The applicant’s attorney explained that the building height needed to increase by two feet to accommodate higher ceiling heights per floor, and parking spaces were reduced from 33 to 14 due to the elimination of a basement level. The applicant argued the changes were necessitated by high construction costs and emphasized that the project’s location was ideal for residents utilizing public transportation.

Board members expressed concerns about the parking allocation, particularly for affordable units, which would not be eligible for parking spaces. The architect clarified the need for higher ceilings due to construction requirements, while the applicant assured that the project’s design had undergone several iterations. Despite concerns raised about potential parking demand exceeding supply, the board approved the modifications, highlighting ongoing challenges in balancing development needs with community concerns.

The meeting also addressed a proposal for a new residential condominium on Washington Street in Roslindale. Presented by attorney Jeff Drago on behalf of developer John Wardwell, the project involves constructing a building with eight residential units and four parking spaces on a vacant parcel. The design aligns with the surrounding multifamily residential area and incorporates community feedback, including a green roof and permeable pavers. Variances were requested for several zoning requirements, with the board inquiring about the absence of affordable units. Public testimony supported the proposal, noting minimal opposition from the Roslindale community, resulting in unanimous board approval.

Additionally, the board considered a proposal for a mixed-use building on Washington Street. The project, represented by attorney Jeff Drago for the Peninsula Capital Group, involved community engagement and modifications to the original plan, including a reduction in building height and unit count. The proposal received approval from the BPDA and various local civic associations. Despite concerns from the Brighton Alustin Improvement Association regarding density and traffic, the board approved the project, emphasizing the need for aesthetic considerations in urban development.