02:40One notable issue was the tree removal replacement ordinance, particularly the lack of applications during winter and unauthorized tree removals. The commission noted complaints, specifically mentioning unauthorized tree removals at the pool club in a riparian zone, which compelled zoning officer intervention. Limited by time constraints, members recognized the need for an arborist to investigate these unauthorized removals. The current application process was criticized for lacking clarity and essential information, such as tree species and contractor names, prompting discussions to streamline the process and increase ordinance accessibility for residents.

10:11The commission emphasized the importance of enforcement and understanding their authority in addressing violations. Members expressed concerns about perceived inequity in enforcement and recognized the township’s failure to provide clear guidelines, which frustrates residents who comply with the ordinance while others do not. Plans were made to revisit these discussions in April, focusing on improving application processes and community outreach.

17:35A critical element discussed was the commission’s role in reviewing proposed tree species for township planting. Members considered contracting outside experts to ensure adherence to the approved species list, which restricts certain objectionable species. The commission has been reviewing these lists for three years, acknowledging past communication gaps. The commission acknowledged the importance of including updates in the mayor’s bi-weekly letter to enhance public awareness.

11:16Internally, the commission recognized the need for clearer processes involving homeowners, developers, and tree violations. A proposal was made to form a working group to compile FAQs about the ordinance and its application. Members expressed frustration over the lack of designated enforcement officers and highlighted the absence of a public works secretary as a factor in communication breakdowns. The necessity of better tracking tree removals and establishing a structured process was emphasized.

34:02The meeting also addressed tree management issues, including a significant tree removal in Cranbury Green that resulted in road blockages due to high winds. The importance of the tree inventory was stressed, noting the need for detailed data on species and location. The Department of Public Works’ failure to provide invoices last year was mentioned, underlining the importance of receiving data promptly. An arborist was deemed necessary to assess tree health, especially as utility companies’ tree trimming practices were criticized.

41:33Plans for Arbor Day 2025 were discussed, with a confirmed location at Village Park for planting a native ornamental tree. The commission considered involving the community in tree selection and addressed concerns about gator bags left on trees over winter, which can harm tree health. The need for timely watering and planting, considering drought conditions, was also noted.

44:37A significant portion of the meeting focused on developing a recommended trees list. The commission emphasized eliminating problematic species in favor of straight species and proposed adding live links to plant profiles for easier access to information.

47:58The commission also discussed the shift away from cultivars toward straight species in tree selection, emphasizing the benefits of species that have thrived in the local climate. Concerns about the availability of straight species in local nurseries were raised, and the commission aimed to guide homeowners in tree selection, especially for street trees. The need for a balanced tree list, including evergreens, was recognized, and the commission acknowledged requests from residents for evergreen shrubs for year-round screening.