The proposal to introduce a user fee for trash collection could alter how residents pay for this service. The Selectmen suggested a quarterly fee of approximately $50, totaling $200 annually. This fee would replace the current tax-based system and potentially allow residents the option to opt out of town services in favor of private haulers. The primary goal is to offset financial obligations, particularly those tied to capital improvements at local schools.

However, concerns were raised about the feasibility of this user fee approach. If several residents choose private haulers over the town service, it might necessitate increasing the fee for remaining participants, potentially to $75 per quarter. This adjustment would be necessary to maintain the program’s financial viability. Acknowledging the differing waste production levels among households, the Selectmen also discussed the importance of reviewing the pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) bag costs biannually, allowing for flexible fees that account for household size variations.

The meeting also addressed grant opportunities to enhance local waste management practices. One focus was securing a $6,000 grant for a swap shed and universal waste management improvements. The swap shed is intended to facilitate responsible electronic waste disposal, starting with a limited range of items to ensure manageability. Liability concerns related to accepting electronics were discussed, with a consensus on the necessity of clear operational guidelines.

In tandem with the swap shed initiative, the Board highlighted a composting program aimed at reducing household food waste. The current town compost pile only accepts yard waste, but the new program would encourage backyard composting of both yard and food waste. A proposal was made to use RDP funds to subsidize the cost of backyard compost bins, estimated at $65 each. The town plans to offer these bins at a reduced rate of $30 to encourage participation.

To ensure the success of the composting program, education was emphasized as critical. Residents need guidance on what can be composted and the benefits of composting, such as improved soil quality and reduced waste costs. The Board discussed creating educational flyers and using social media to gauge public interest. Concerns about potential low community support were acknowledged, with a cautious approach recommended to gauge interest before fully committing resources.

Another topic was the handling and disposal of rugs at the town’s transfer station. The discussion revealed logistical challenges in accepting rugs due to varying sizes and the absence of a weighing scale, complicating fee assessments. The Board proposed not accepting rugs at the transfer station, instead encouraging residents to cut them into smaller pieces for disposal in PAYT bags. This approach reflects a broader strategy to streamline waste disposal processes and minimize costs.

Lastly, the conversation touched on the broader financial implications of the town’s recycling and waste management systems. The current recycling fee, funded through appropriated funds, was discussed in light of the proposed user fee structure. The Board recognized the need to explore collaborative efforts with neighboring towns for hazardous waste disposal, a move that could optimize resources and reduce costs.