The public comment session of the East Brunswick Town Council meeting drew attention, as several residents voiced their concerns about the U.S. government’s support for Israel amid the escalating conflict in Gaza. Muhammad, a first-generation Palestinian American, delivered a plea, stating that U.S. policies were enabling what he described as the “genocide of Palestinians, primarily women and children.” He cited statistics, alleging that “over 36 hospitals” had been destroyed and “50,021 Palestinians have been murdered,” most of whom he claimed were women and children. Muhammad questioned the ethical considerations of U.S. financial aid to Israel, emphasizing that nearly $4 billion is allocated annually while domestic programs suffer cuts. He called for a ceasefire, the release of hostages, and an arms embargo against Israel, stressing the importance of prioritizing domestic needs over foreign assistance.

Following Muhammad, Mark Pepper, a third-generation Jewish American, shared his shifting perspective on Israel. Reflecting on his upbringing, he acknowledged that his previously unwavering support for Israel had waned over time. Pepper criticized organizations like AIPAC, describing them as “pure evil,” and highlighted historical conflicts such as the Six-Day War, which he believed had exacerbated tensions. He advocated for a negotiated peace settlement to end violence on both sides.

The discourse continued with Atika, who underscored the importance of First Amendment rights, arguing that pro-Palestinian voices were being silenced and students were facing retribution for their views. She attributed these actions to the current U.S. administration, urging council members to recognize the gravity of the situation and advocate for change.

Another speaker, Steven Marlo, representing New Jersey Peace Action, echoed calls for a ceasefire and emphasized the moral responsibility of the council to align its actions with justice and peace. Marlo posed rhetorical questions about how history would judge the council’s actions, urging consideration of their legacy and the impact on the community’s future.

In addition to the passionate public comments, the council addressed several municipal matters. Mayor Brad Cohen discussed the township’s ongoing affordable housing obligations, noting a contested requirement to provide 315 units over a decade. After negotiations, the Department of Community Affairs agreed to reduce this number to 265 units, though litigation from the Builders Association remains pending.

The council also moved swiftly through budgetary matters, approving several resolutions and ordinances without public dissent. Amendments to the municipal budget were approved, including adjustments to the pool utility revenues and appropriations. The council unanimously adopted the 2025 municipal budget, totaling $81,469,455, which covers various municipal purposes and the minimum library levy.

Routine resolutions, grouped under a consent agenda, were approved unanimously, with the exception of resolution 25-161, which was removed for separate discussion. Notably, one council member acknowledged a long-serving township employee’s contributions.

The council introduced six ordinances, including amendments to bond ordinances and appropriations for capital improvements. These measures were all approved without opposition. Ordinance 25-17, related to the Bright View Redevelopment Project, authorized a drainage and roadway improvement easement, facilitating a four-story independent living facility.