A point of discussion was the proposed ordinance concerning warehouse developments, particularly the regulations on minimum distance from residential zones. The board reviewed previous requirements which mandated a 500-foot buffer, now proposed to be reduced to 200 feet. This adjustment raised concerns among attendees, who argued that maintaining or even increasing the distance would better protect residential areas. The board clarified that while they cannot deny applications based on market conditions like vacancy rates, they have increased setbacks from 100 feet to 200 feet in response to community feedback. Attendees expressed disappointment over the change, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of developments’ financial and environmental impacts.

Further deliberation addressed the township’s noise ordinance compliance for warehouses and the potential traffic implications of new developments. Although the board cannot reject applications solely due to traffic concerns, they can request developer contributions towards road improvements, highlighting an ongoing dialogue about infrastructure needs. Additionally, the height restrictions for warehouses were questioned, with the board noting that historical zoning in M1 and M2 zones allowed for a 50-foot maximum, and that merging with the old BI zone did not alter these limits.

The meeting also tackled amendments to the board’s bylaws, focusing on renotification requirements for adjourned hearings. The proposed changes aim to improve transparency and communication, mandating that applicants renotify if a hearing is postponed more than once, unless waived by the board for good cause. This amendment seeks to enhance accountability and ensure residents remain informed about developments affecting their community.

Another topic was the draft ordinance for the BI zone, with a dedicated master plan hearing scheduled for April 29 to invite public comments. The board discussed updates to the draft ordinance, including revised language on loading dock ratios and setbacks to increase buffering between new developments and residential zones. A resident’s concern about the adequacy of a 200-foot buffer was addressed, with clarification that previous ordinances mandated a 500-foot separation.

The board also reviewed a proposed ordinance aligning with existing township regulations for outdoor activities near residential zones, prohibiting loading activities during specified evening and morning hours. This ordinance includes requirements for fencing and design standards to enhance architectural quality and address environmental concerns, such as the introduction of bicycle repair stations and anti-idling signs, reflecting Environmental Commission suggestions.

Residents raised issues about the removal of trees for construction and the need for understanding warehouse types planned for Franklin Township. The board acknowledged these concerns, encouraging participation in future meetings to address broader planning topics.