One notable issue discussed was the adoption of Ordinance 778, which amended the residential parking regulations. This initiative stemmed from the planning commission’s review prompted by community service officers’ concerns about vague language in the existing code. These ambiguities had led to challenges in enforcing parking rules, particularly regarding vehicles parked on lawns and the proliferation of weeds around them. The ordinance aimed to clarify these regulations, mandating that vehicles be parked on approved surfaces to prevent such issues. Additionally, new provisions were added to ensure that parking in front yards occurs only on driveways or adjacent surfaces, and multifamily dwellings were restricted from parking outside designated areas.

During the discussion, a council member raised concern over the potential impact of the ordinance’s nuisance clause, which could lead to increased scrutiny of backyard storage. They cautioned against infringing on property rights, emphasizing that enforcement should balance regulatory compliance with homeowners’ autonomy. Despite these concerns, the motion to adopt Ordinance 778, including the nuisance clause, received unanimous support.

Another topic was the council’s deliberation on the police chief’s pay raise. Initially part of the consent agenda, the item was moved to new business for further discussion. The council clarified that the proposed 6% increase was a cost-of-living adjustment, rather than a merit-based raise. The City Administrator explained that performance reviews for department heads, such as the police chief, are typically managed through the City Administrator’s office, not the council. The council reviewed the police chief’s responsibilities and achievements over the past year, including plans and accomplishments outlined in an email from the chief. It was agreed that no back pay would be issued for the period during which the raise should have been implemented. The motion to approve the pay increase passed with a 3-1 vote.

The council also tackled compliance issues related to modifications in Duffy’s development plans. Initially approved in 2023, Duffy’s plan included a car wash and expanded convenience store. However, recent changes to the site, such as parking layout and landscaping alterations, did not align with the original approval. Concerns arose regarding ADA compliance for handicap parking and other code adherence issues. The council considered options, including sending the matter back to the planning commission or allowing the building official to resolve compliance issues directly. Ultimately, a motion was passed to have the building official work with Duffy’s to address and resolve these compliance issues, particularly concerning handicap parking and ADA standards, before closing permits. An update on the progress is expected once the issues are resolved.

Additionally, the council discussed Ordinance 777, which proposed updates to the fee schedule, particularly concerning rental inspections and the use of city ball fields. The ordinance adjusts rental inspection fees to reflect actual costs incurred by Rum River, unless subsidized by the city. Furthermore, a new fee structure was introduced for using city ball fields, prompted by the Cottage Grove Athletic Association’s interest following the disbandment of the St. Paul Park Athletic Association. The fee schedule ensures that local teams are exempt from charges, with a tiered pricing system for neighboring communities to encourage local sports participation.

Council members also provided updates on their respective committees, with Council Member Swenson mentioning an upcoming public works committee meeting, while Council Member Hagerty noted changes to the public safety commission meeting time. Council Member Whitson discussed an upcoming garden party event organized by the Parks and Recreation committee. These updates reflect ongoing efforts to engage the community and address local needs through various initiatives.