A comprehensive presentation on the Highway 7 corridor study took center stage, driven by historical safety concerns and a fatal accident in the Eureka area. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) conducted a study between 2021 and 2022, proposing three alternatives for future developments: a no-build option, the introduction of roundabouts, and non-traditional intersections. The study aims to guide improvements ahead of a planned resurfacing project slated for 2029.

The council analyzed proposals, including a potential roundabout at County Road 92 and modifications to the Kings Point roundabout. Discussions revealed concerns about the two-lane layout of roundabouts, which could cause driver confusion and accidents. A council member expressed skepticism about replacing existing stoplights with roundabouts. There was an argument for maintaining the traffic light but with clearer signal indications.

Additionally, the problematic intersection at Highland Road was debated, with proposed changes restricting it to a right-out-only access. This could potentially cause confusion and longer travel routes for drivers. Council members stressed the importance of considering future area developments, such as a 40-acre site at Highland and Highway 7, which may increase traffic flow. The council emphasized the necessity of effective communication with MnDOT regarding access point feedback, especially concerning Highland Road’s future significance.

The discussion also acknowledged the possibility of transforming Highway 7 into a limited-access highway, potentially minimizing intersections. However, this suggestion faced challenges, including the need for additional infrastructure like frontage roads. The timeline for these changes was addressed, with 2029 as the earliest implementation date, though potential developments might accelerate this timeline. The council highlighted the corridor study’s role in ensuring that future development aligns with MnDOT’s access plans.

Another topic was the ongoing negotiations concerning the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) related to fire services. Representatives from Minnetrista, Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, and Mound have been working to revise the financial formula dictating cost distribution among the communities. The current debate centers around the fairness of basing financial contributions on market value, which could disproportionately affect Minnetrista due to its rising property values and growth. A council representative opposed a formula weighted entirely on market value, emphasizing that it does not benefit Minnetrista.

An alternative proposal was introduced. This approach aims to stabilize financial contributions without immediate drastic increases for the involved communities. The council stressed the importance of a robust agreement, including penalties for any party attempting to back out after committing to the terms.

The meeting also delved into the topic of residential chicken ownership, spurred by residents’ interest in keeping chickens within city limits. Current city code generally prohibits farm animals in residential zones unless properties are at least ten acres. However, a proposal was made to allow up to three egg-laying hens per residential lot, aligning with regulations in neighboring cities like Minnetonka and Edina.

Council members debated the implications of allowing chickens, including waste management and the attraction of other animals. They considered a minimum lot size requirement of half an acre and a stipulation that hens must be kept in enclosed areas. A resident’s letter proposed a straightforward ordinance amendment, specifying a maximum of one hen per tenth of an acre and outlining responsibilities for cleanliness and containment. The potential influence of homeowners’ associations and the need for a permitting process were also discussed.

The council agreed to revisit the topic in a future meeting, allowing staff to gather more information on current lot sizes and refine the proposal based on community feedback.

Additionally, the council discussed the procurement of a new camera system for city use. The existing system, in place since 2016, was failing and in need of replacement. There was a call for competitive bidding to ensure thorough evaluation and cost-effectiveness. The council considered engaging other vendors for recommendations, emphasizing compatibility with police department needs. A detailed specifications sheet was deemed necessary to facilitate a fair comparison of proposals.