Dr. Thomas Farrell, Superintendent, presented the proposed budget, underlining the district’s financial struggles exacerbated by the state’s funding formula, which has resulted in a considerable loss of state aid. The district faces a $2.8 million shortfall for the 2025-2026 school year. The budget, crafted with input from the central office administrative team, reflects a tax levy increase of 3.14% over the 2% cap, totaling a 5.14% increase, and includes the elimination of debt service. Despite a 6% rise in state aid from the previous year, the increase has not met the district’s needs, particularly in special education and at-risk populations.

The proposed budget entails a reduction of seven full-time equivalent positions, which is hoped to be achieved through attrition rather than layoffs. These measures aim to align with budget realities while striving to maintain educational standards.

Dr. Farrell emphasized the importance of addressing the district’s significant funding inadequacies, pointing out that state support for special education has not kept pace with rising costs. This shortfall could potentially lead to litigation against the New Jersey Department of Education, although the legal process would be lengthy. Dr. Farrell also highlighted efforts to secure additional funding through grants and the importance of continued advocacy for equitable state funding.

Community members participated in the discussion, expressing concerns about the budget’s impact on educational programs and staffing. Several speakers, including parents and former board members, urged the board to approve the budget while advocating for fair funding from the state. They emphasized the importance of supporting teachers and maintaining manageable class sizes, recognizing the critical role of strong public schools in community well-being and property values.

The board also addressed concerns about the special education program’s funding calculation methods. The previous reliance on a census basis assumed that 15.9% of total enrollment represented special education needs, which was unfair to the district as the actual percentage was higher. The S2 funding formula caps losses and gains, further complicating the district’s financial landscape.

In addition to budgetary issues, the meeting touched on various educational updates and achievements within the district. Reports from Brick Township High School and Brick Memorial High School highlighted student accomplishments, including successful career days, motivational presentations, and spring sports achievements. The board expressed gratitude to teachers and staff for their dedication, particularly during Teacher Appreciation Week.

The meeting also included discussions on facilities and capital projects, with particular attention given to the condition of visitor bleachers at Brick Township High School and the roof at Brick Memorial. These issues were emphasized due to potential safety liabilities and the need for timely resolutions.

Speakers raised concerns about the declining student population, the impact of tax increases on residents, and the need for better engagement with state government to address funding issues. The board acknowledged these concerns and emphasized their commitment to navigating the district’s financial challenges while advocating for necessary resources.

The budget was ultimately approved, with board members expressing support for the proposal despite the challenging circumstances. They highlighted the importance of maintaining teacher positions and school programs.