11:39The proposed backyard chicken ordinance emerged as the focal point of the meeting, drawing extensive discussion and public input. Proponents highlighted the benefits of allowing chickens, citing sustainable food production, pest management, and educational opportunities for families. The ordinance stipulates a maximum of six chickens per household, with a strict prohibition on roosters to mitigate noise concerns. Key provisions include setback requirements mandating chicken coops be at least 30 feet from neighboring dwellings and 10 feet from lot lines to address odor issues.

42:20A member underscored the importance of clarifying the requirement for a permit, particularly in core districts where meeting the 30-foot setback might prove challenging. Historical context was provided, noting that the previous ordinance, requiring a minimum of five acres for chicken ownership, had deterred applications due to its burdensome nature. Advocates argued that the current housing market renders such a requirement unrealistic, urging for a more accessible regulation.

23:34Public comments varied, with one resident raising concerns about waste management and the feasibility of composting chicken waste on smaller lots. Another resident spoke in favor of the ordinance, emphasizing the educational benefits for children and contrasting Westfield’s restrictive stance with more permissive neighboring towns. The board acknowledged that existing permit processes could be burdensome, with costs potentially reaching $300 due to legal and registry fees.

The discussion also considered the ordinance’s implications for two-family homes. Concerns were raised about potential opposition from neighbors based on misconceptions, prompting suggestions for a straightforward approval process based on lot size.

33:02Monica Melchione expressed strong support for the ordinance, pointing to high demand for chickens at local supply stores. She proposed solutions for managing roosters, offering to transport them to auctions to prevent community disturbances. In contrast, Jane Oxen opposed the ordinance, arguing that chickens classified as farm animals require larger property sizes. She voiced concerns about potential property tax increases due to necessary health department inspections and animal control oversight.

The board discussed transitioning from a formal permitting process to a registration system, where residents would notify animal control officers of their chicken ownership. This approach aims to simplify compliance while maintaining oversight, with enforcement primarily driven by complaints.

54:32In other matters, the board approved a special permit for New Life Worship Center’s electronic sign. Pastor Gene Pelke’s proposal to replace the church’s manual sign with a digital one was well-received. The board confirmed the sign would display static messages changing every ten seconds, in line with existing policies against animated content. Gabriel from GG Signs assured the board that the sign’s brightness could be adjusted to prevent neighborhood disturbances.

01:04:06The meeting also addressed plans not requiring approval under subdivision control law, approving a plan for a property on Honey Pot Road involving the sale of two lots to the Commonwealth. The board endorsed the Nathaniel Hill Subdivision plans, subject to performance guarantees including a covenant on lot sales pending road construction completion.