The garage variance on Hobart Avenue was a topic of substantial discussion, given the property’s unique topography and historical significance. The proposed garage, part of a larger renovation project, required a variance due to its placement 4.33 feet from the rear structure, rather than the standard 12-foot setback. The applicant argued that the steep slopes on the property and existing site configuration limited alternative locations for the garage without causing significant disruption. This argument was supported by claims that the proposed design would enhance the property’s aesthetic and functional value, aligning with the Gothic Revival style of the existing home.

The board deliberated on the necessity of the variance under C1 and C2 criteria, considering the physical constraints imposed by the property and the potential public benefits of the proposed plan. The applicant emphasized that the design, including the removal of dormers, would adhere to community aesthetic standards while providing adequate parking and eliminating non-conforming conditions.

Stormwater management was a critical concern, with assurances that an over-engineered system would handle water runoff effectively. The system included a level spreader to disperse water gently and avoid exacerbating existing drainage issues. The applicant confirmed that existing soil conservation certifications would be updated to reflect new plans.

Public comments during the meeting included concerns about the project’s impact on existing drainage patterns and the preservation of historically significant elements of the property. The board addressed these by outlining conditions for approval, such as compliance with engineering memoranda and preserving specific trees. A suggestion to extend the landscaping jurisdiction to three years post-construction was agreed upon to ensure the longevity of planted trees.

Another notable application involved a property on Essex Road, where the board approved a variance for replacing air conditioning units and installing a generator. The homeowner cited safety and aesthetic reasons for the installations, with assurances that existing screening would minimize neighborhood impact. The board found the proposal met the necessary variance standards without requiring additional conditions.

The meeting also discussed a comprehensive renovation on West End Avenue, where the applicant sought variances for several structural modifications. Concerns from residents about the project’s environmental impact, particularly regarding stormwater management and aesthetic integration with the neighborhood, were addressed. The board emphasized the need for clear compliance with zoning regulations and environmental standards.

The approval of the garage variance on Hobart Avenue, in particular, underscored the board’s willingness to accommodate unique property challenges while ensuring adherence to zoning laws.