The meeting began with a analysis of transportation needs. Board members emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach to infrastructure improvements, particularly in downtown areas. Concerns were raised about the poor condition of sidewalks, with some members expressing shock at their inadequacy, especially in areas frequented by families and individuals using mobility aids. The board acknowledged the necessity of addressing these issues to enhance accessibility and safety for all residents.

One of the key recommendations discussed was updating the town’s complete streets prioritization plan. It was noted that the town could apply for state funding of up to $500,000 to support improvements to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. The potential financial benefit of securing external funding was highlighted, with one board member stating, “If we can get the money, let’s get the money.”

The board also explored the promotion of existing transit services in Danvers. Despite lacking a commuter rail, the town offers several public transit options, including the Salem Skipper, Senior Shuttle, Veterans Van, MBTA bus, Kata Bus, and Logan Express. A recommendation was made to collaborate with these service operators to develop a promotional campaign, increasing awareness of routes, fees, and schedules. The campaign would aim to make transit information more accessible, with materials available in English and Spanish and disseminated through various channels, including social media.

Zoning bylaws were another focal point, with discussions on revising them to promote sustainable development. The current zoning approach was described as outdated, separating land uses and complicating transportation. A more integrated approach was proposed, facilitating walking and biking, reducing traffic congestion, and lowering emissions. The board considered reducing or eliminating minimum off-street parking requirements for new developments, allowing developers to provide parking based on market demand rather than strict regulations.

In addition to pedestrian and transit improvements, the need for an updated parking management plan for downtown was discussed. A parking study from 2015 was referenced, highlighting existing management issues. The board recognized the need for a new analysis to inform future decision-making. Options included engaging the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) or a private consultant to conduct the study, with consideration given to waiting for certain development projects to reach specific occupancy levels before proceeding.

One member highlighted the significance of focusing on pedestrian initiatives, particularly for the young and those with mobility challenges. This sentiment was echoed by others, leading to a consensus that pedestrian-focused recommendations should take precedence over other proposals.

Public comments further emphasized transportation and safety concerns. Residents shared their perspectives, with some advocating for the prioritization of pedestrian safety over bike lanes. Others noted the town’s walkable environment, calling for sidewalk repairs, especially on streets like River Street. Additionally, concerns about the costs associated with public transportation were raised, with suggestions to explore alternative grant options for educational initiatives related to traffic safety.

The meeting also touched on the reliance on outdated studies for decision-making, particularly regarding parking management. The board agreed that decisions should be informed by data no older than three years, particularly concerning areas like Maple Square. The need for a comprehensive master plan was noted, as the absence of such a plan was seen as a barrier to informed prioritization decisions.

As the meeting concluded, the board shifted focus to upcoming projects, including a mixed-use development proposal for the old Danvers Pharmacy building. Concerns about the adequacy of existing parking for this development were discussed, with plans to incorporate the existing parking lot into the project.