The foremost issue discussed was the introduction of a Vita’s ice cream store in a neighborhood with historical significance, with residents expressing dissatisfaction over the lack of notification and consultation. Marva Wade, a long-time resident, articulated her frustration about the absence of communication regarding the establishment. She highlighted that residents were not notified before the installation of neon signs on the historic train station building, which dates back to 1870. Wade lamented the lack of community engagement, suggesting that if consulted, she would have recommended alternative uses for the historic structure. Her concerns extended to the potential negative impacts of the ice cream shop, such as increased traffic, noise, and littering, questioning whether an environmental impact study had been conducted. Wade concluded by questioning whose interests were prioritized, asserting that it was not the taxpaying residents of Barry Place and Van Halton Avenue.

Anthony Wade, also from Barry Place, echoed his wife’s sentiments, recounting his experience of witnessing changes around the train station and feeling dismissed by city officials when seeking clarification. He was informed that notification beyond a newspaper announcement was not required, which he found disrespectful. Parker Brown, another resident, criticized the effectiveness of such public notices, questioning the council’s engagement with the community and its responsiveness to residents’ needs.

These comments underscored a growing sentiment among residents regarding the council’s transparency and communication practices.

Broader community issues were also raised during the meeting, including financial hardships and safety concerns. One resident shared difficulties with high electricity bills, highlighting the broader issue of financial hardship in the community. He emphasized that many residents might not feel comfortable seeking assistance, pointing to a lack of support for those in need, particularly regarding utility payment assistance. Councilwoman Miller responded by informing the resident about available resources, including programs like the weatherization program and financial assistance for utility bills, encouraging residents to utilize various communication methods to access these resources.

Safety concerns were highlighted by another resident, Ms. Griggs, who shared her troubling experience of being attacked by an unleashed dog in a residential area. She expressed frustration over the police response, which deemed the situation acceptable since the area was classified as a park. Griggs demanded accountability, questioning the effectiveness of police protection and the enforcement of leash laws.

Further issues regarding city management were raised by resident Joe Connosente, who inquired about the sale status of an old tennis court and ongoing problems with clogged storm drains. He questioned the approval of a new three-family building on How Avenue without parking provisions, expressing concerns over increasing congestion. Connosente also addressed the proliferation of election signs on utility poles, calling for their removal as they violate regulations, and expressed frustration over the high number of barber shops and smoke shops opening in the community.

In response to these concerns, a council member assured Connosente that regulations regarding flag displays would be verified. The mayor also responded, clarifying that campaign signs are a common practice during elections and emphasizing equal rights to campaign visibility for all candidates. He acknowledged the need for better communication with residents, particularly those feeling disconnected from council activities.

The mayor emphasized the importance of addressing community concerns about transit development and upkeep, expressing a commitment to ensure residents’ voices are heard. He acknowledged that existing notification methods, such as newspapers and public hearings, might be insufficient, and highlighted ongoing efforts to address cleanliness and upkeep near NJ Transit locations.

Councilwoman Miller proposed conducting a survey to gather feedback on residents’ preferred communication methods, noting that many might not read newspapers. The mayor agreed, highlighting the need for more innovative approaches to engage residents effectively. The council recognized the broader challenge faced by municipalities in communicating with residents, acknowledging the cost of required newspaper advertisements that may not reach the intended audience.

The meeting also included discussions about ordinance amendments, community contributions, and resolutions. A public hearing was held for ordinance number 2483-25, which proposed amendments to restricted parking for disabled persons, and was subsequently ratified. The council also recognized the 90th birthday of Mrs. Muriel Luis Pereira Hunter, celebrating her contributions to the city’s senior program by declaring “Muriel Hunter Day.”

As the meeting concluded, updates were provided on roadwork and a new ride program in partnership with the state county board of commissioners, aimed at providing affordable transportation options for residents. This program is set to launch with the first few weeks of service offered for free.