The focal point of the meeting was the proposed redevelopment of the vacant property on South Bridge Street, which has stood empty for nearly 15 years. The project aims to transform the property from a two-family dwelling to a four-family dwelling. The proposal involves adding a two-story rear addition and maintaining the historical character of the building’s brick facade. The applicant, who purchased the property in 2016, faced complications with previous approvals due to stormwater management issues, which stalled progress. The building, described as dilapidated, has been a persistent concern for neighboring residents.

A point of discussion was the report by a board planner, which highlighted the necessity of addressing safety hazards like the building’s deteriorating roof. Concerns were raised about the structural integrity, with a neighboring property owner expressing alarm over the building’s condition. The owner noted that a section of the second floor had collapsed into the basement, posing a potential safety risk to the neighborhood. The board agreed to include conditions in the preliminary approval to ensure these hazards are addressed promptly.

The board’s decision to grant preliminary approval was driven by the need to remedy the current state of the property, which many members described as an eyesore. The approval includes a mandate for site cleanup, including the removal of hazardous trees and debris. Additionally, the applicant is required to address the building’s structural issues before final approval is considered. This step is intended to ensure that any redevelopment aligns with safety standards and community expectations.

In addition to structural concerns, the meeting addressed zoning variances required for the project. These include variances for front yard and driveway setbacks, which do not conform to current regulations. The applicant argued that these variances are necessary due to unique conditions on the property and would not negatively impact the neighborhood’s visual experience. The board also discussed stormwater management, emphasizing that post-development runoff should not exceed pre-development levels.

Another aspect of the meeting was the broader implications of the project’s approval on the neighborhood. Board members expressed mixed sentiments about the increasing number of multifamily dwellings in the area. Some members voiced hopes that the redevelopment would include provisions for community needs, such as designating apartments for homeless veterans.

Community involvement played a role in the meeting, with residents voicing concerns about the project’s impact. A resident from a nearby property questioned the proximity of the new construction to their home, emphasizing the need for careful planning to avoid encroachment on neighboring properties. The board acknowledged these concerns.

The meeting also touched on ancillary issues, such as the inclusion of electric vehicle charging stations and the potential installation of sprinklers, which the current building code does not mandate for the proposed structure.

Beyond the specific case of 121 South Bridge Street, the meeting included updates on the borough’s housing element and fair share plan. The plan, which outlines the borough’s housing development strategy, shows substantial growth in residential units and resident income over recent years. It addresses the need for housing rehabilitation, reducing the number of substandard units previously identified. The board highlighted the importance of aligning future developments with these strategic plans to ensure cohesive community growth.