The board spent significant time debating the municipal electricity aggregation procurement program. The central issue was whether to lock in a greener electricity rate for three years, a decision that would impact all residents. The Clean Energy and Sustainability Committee recommended defaulting to a greener energy option, with flexibility for residents to opt into different pricing tiers. Concerns were raised about the possibility of higher bills, despite efforts to ensure clear communication and options for residents. The board ultimately authorized the town manager to negotiate a three-year contract focused on greener energy, a decision supported by four members, with one dissenting.

In another significant agenda item, the board signed the warrant for a special town meeting scheduled for June 23, 2025. Five articles were included, with the primary focus on partially replacing the South Elementary School roof. Additional articles sought supplemental funding for school elevator projects, a perimeter survey of Kulis Farm, a placeholder for collective bargaining agreements, and private family mausoleum regulations in public burial grounds.

The meeting also touched on the process for appointing a new town manager. The board reviewed the draft appointment process, which included deciding whether to engage a search firm for the screening committee responsible for candidate selection. With no additional comments or edits from previous meetings, the draft was approved unanimously. The discussion included ensuring a balance between select board representation and community input on the screening committee, emphasizing transparency and involvement in the selection process. The town manager’s role is crucial, and the board aims to conduct a thorough and inclusive search to fill the position.

Beyond these primary topics, the meeting covered a range of issues, from budgetary concerns to community development initiatives. The ongoing assessment of the fiscal year’s end showed optimism for finishing with a surplus, allowing for further infrastructure investments, such as road and utility projects. The board discussed options for expanding sewer capacity, a issue given the town’s growth potential and infrastructure limitations. Collaboration with neighboring towns was suggested, although concerns about sharing existing capacities were noted.

Additionally, the board highlighted the need to engage younger populations in civic activities. The potential establishment of a civic academy aimed at educating residents about town departments was discussed, with the goal of increasing participation in local governance.

The meeting also addressed the status of parks and recreation services in Chelmsford. The absence of a dedicated department was noted, with concerns about the economic viability of establishing one. The board discussed alternative approaches to enhance coordination among existing programs and organizations, recognizing the challenges faced by volunteer groups in maintaining participation.

In a lighter note, preparations for the upcoming July 4th events were acknowledged, with gratitude expressed toward various departments for their support. The parade committee called for more community involvement, encouraging participation and sponsorships to fund the celebrations.

As the meeting concluded, the board moved into an executive session to discuss litigation strategies concerning the North Chelmsford Water District and collective bargaining with several employee labor unions. This session underscored the town’s ongoing efforts to manage legal and labor relations effectively.