The most notable topic was the public hearing on a proposed PUD application by the David J. Miner 2 and Natalie Living Trust to rezone approximately 9.37 acres on North Highway 17 in Palatka. The application seeks to transition the land from the Agriculture Zoning District to a PUD to create a family compound with up to nine residential units. Staff member Michael Graves presented the case, noting the property’s frontage along US Highway 17 and clarifying inaccuracies in the GIS map related to wetlands. The applicant prefers a PUD over a type three family subdivision to maintain the property within a family trust for future generations.

Discussion quickly turned to procedural concerns, with some board members questioning the absence of a DRC review prior to the public hearing, a step typically mandated by section 45-223 of the county code. Graves explained that the DRC had not yet reviewed the project, as the applicant was presenting directly to the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners first, with the DRC review to follow. This approach was intended to streamline the process, although it sparked debate about potential conflicts with the established code. One member questioned the adequacy of this method.

Another focal point was the concern over whether the PUD process might bypass proper oversight. A board member voiced apprehension, stating, “I think too many of the things that we approve go through this commission,” indicating a need for more community engagement and oversight from elected officials. The member’s remarks highlighted a perceived lack of input from elected officials before projects reach the Planning Commission.

The proposal also raised questions about the infrastructure, particularly the plan to use a single well for all residential units. Graves clarified that the parcels appeared divided on the GIS map but were legally one parcel, and the well arrangement would be addressed during the DRC review. The discussion concluded with a consensus among some members that the project should undergo DRC review before any further consideration by the Planning Commission.

Another topic of the meeting was a zoning map amendment request by Aloha LLC, seeking to change a parcel from residential one (R1) to residential two (R2) to permit the construction of a single-family mobile home. The area is predominantly R2, but the subject property remained R1, complicating plans. The staff recommended approval, citing alignment with the comprehensive plan’s goals, although the commission raised concerns about the potential impact on property values and land use.

Public comment played a role in the proceedings, with neighbors expressing opposition to the rezoning. A letter from a neighbor, James John Nelson Jr., was read into the record, voicing concerns about potential negative impacts on property values. The commission ultimately decided to recommend denial of the rezoning application, emphasizing consistency with existing land use policies.

The meeting also touched on a proposed change from a PUD to a C3 zoning classification, allowing for more intense commercial uses. The current PUD permits limited commercial activities, and the C3 designation would broaden the scope. Concerns about utility connections, particularly the requirement to connect to city water and sewer systems, were discussed. Public comments underscored local opposition to the changes, with residents citing traffic and environmental concerns.