The most pressing topic was the application for a certificate of appropriateness for the total demolition of a single-family home on Michigan Avenue. Public concerns were raised about the applicant’s neglect of the property, which had led to deterioration. A public commenter expressed frustration over the lack of action in addressing these issues, highlighting the broader issue of demolition by neglect in the historic district. The city’s head of historic preservation confirmed existing code violations and noted that while some maintenance, like lot clearance, had occurred, necessary building repair permits had not been pursued.

A board member suggested that the city require a construction fence to prevent unauthorized access and further damage, revealing a violation for the failure to obtain a permit for such fencing. The discussion also touched on whether future project permits would hinge on settling past fines, with the city’s special magistrate being the deciding authority. The applicant’s representative requested a continuance of the discussion, which the board approved, moving the application to the July 8 meeting in hopes of a full board discussion.

Another application reviewed was for a property on Jefferson Avenue, which sought partial demolition and renovation, including constructing additions and requesting variances. Public objections centered around perceived attempts to bypass zoning laws, such as disguising a roof deck as bathrooms to avoid setback requirements. Neighbors voiced concerns about the impact on their property and neighborhood, stressing that they had adhered to code requirements, and highlighting the perceived lack of city accountability.

Roger Glad, representing MDPL, opposed changes that would alter the historic architectural features, arguing that the proposed demolition of elements like concrete eyebrows would compromise the building’s integrity. Another resident echoed this sentiment, urging the board to preserve the art deco character of the home. The applicant’s absence led to a motion to continue the application, with a strong recommendation for the applicant to engage with concerned neighbors before the next meeting.

Companion applications for a property on Pennsylvania Avenue, involving after-the-fact demolition and a new residential building, were also discussed. The lack of applicant presence prompted a continuance to the next meeting. Public opposition was voiced against removing conditions limiting new development square footage, emphasizing the importance of preserving older art deco buildings.

The board then addressed an application concerning the demolition of a building on Collins Avenue, which was initially constructed to alleviate parking for the Shelborne Hotel. Discussion revolved around the implications of demolishing the building, particularly regarding parking requirements. Staff clarified that the Shelborne did not have a current parking requirement, and historical construction did not necessitate parking under current regulations. The discussion was continued to the next meeting, pending further investigation into the property’s history.

Lastly, an application for exterior modifications on Collins Avenue, including a new shade structure and outdoor bar counter, was reviewed. Concerns about fire safety regulations for a proposed tiki hut structure were raised, with staff assuring that fire department approval would be necessary. Public concern was also raised about potential traffic congestion from increased services at Sone Cafe, with residents urging the city to assess traffic flow implications.