The council delved into a detailed examination of the city’s wastewater infrastructure, emphasizing the necessity of an asset management and fiscal sustainability plan. A consultant presented an in-depth analysis of the city’s aging wastewater system, originally installed in the 1970s, which is showing signs of wear. The system was described as being in average condition, though some components require urgent attention. Notably, 589 manholes were identified, with a portion in poor or failed condition. The consultant stressed the need for financial planning to maintain and replace these assets as they near the end of their useful life.

During the presentation, it was revealed that approximately 5% of the wastewater system needs immediate replacement, with costs estimated at $1.3 million. To ensure the long-term sustainability of the system, an annual replacement cost of $491,000 was recommended. While this figure was acknowledged as substantial, the council was reminded that funds are already allocated for repairs and replacements.

A risk analysis categorized the city’s assets into low, medium, and high priority, urging the council to prioritize high-priority projects in the capital improvement plan. The discussion also touched on the financial projections for the wastewater and water systems, revealing a potential increase in costs due to rising material and chemical prices. The council debated the need for additional funding sources, such as grants or special assessments, to support these necessary infrastructure projects.

The council moved to formally adopt the resolution approving the wastewater asset management commission’s fiscal sustainability plan, authorizing city officials to implement its recommendations. The council acknowledged the efforts of the public works staff in maintaining the city’s infrastructure, with praise from the mayor and council members for their proactive and efficient management of repairs.

Transitioning from infrastructure to animal control, the council addressed ongoing concerns about the city’s animal control policies. A member proposed scheduling a workshop with animal control management to explore code enforcement strategies for managing loose animals. The proposal suggested integrating the costs of animal pickups into residents’ water bills to ensure that pet owners bear the financial responsibility for their pets, thus alleviating the burden on the general public. This idea was met with support, though further investigation into its legalities was deemed necessary.

The estimated monthly cost for animal control services was reported at $9,000, excluding exotic animals. A council member underscored the urgency of addressing animal control issues, particularly in light of public safety concerns, stating that it is the council’s responsibility to act when residents are affected by incidents such as dog bites.

In addition to infrastructure and animal control discussions, the council considered a proposal for a Fourth of July kingfish tournament organized by the Pier 98 fishing club. The event would feature a fish weigh-in and fireworks display, with the fishing club covering all expenses. While members expressed enthusiasm for the event, logistical challenges such as parking and boat access were noted. The council suggested inviting representatives from the fishing club to address these concerns in a future meeting.