One notable issue discussed was the impending retirement of Police Chief Trum, scheduled for July 17th. The board highlighted the urgency of finding a suitable interim chief and initiating the search for a permanent replacement. The town administrator stressed the importance of beginning this process promptly, given the short timeline and the department’s lack of connections within the policing community. The board debated whether to outsource the recruitment process to a search firm or manage part of it internally with external assistance for the assessment phase. Two firms recommended by Chief Trombly were considered, and there was a consensus on the necessity of proactive engagement to ensure a smooth transition.

Compensation for the interim chief was discussed, with assurances given that the proposed budget was adequate. The board emphasized the importance of maintaining the interim chief’s contractual obligations, including liability coverage, and suggested drafting a new contract to ensure clarity. Additionally, the need to appoint a new sergeant was addressed, which would create an opportunity for a detective position. Recognizing the transitional period within the police department, the board expressed intent to improve communication and support systems, particularly with the dispatch team and IT support.

Another topic was the discussion surrounding the town’s facility management, particularly the challenge of hiring a full-time facilities manager. The board acknowledged a budget discrepancy, with only $40,000 allocated against a requested $70,000 for the position. This shortfall raised concerns about the feasibility of a full-time hire and underscored the need for additional funding. The board agreed on the urgency of finalizing the job description and advertising for the position, with a consensus to inform candidates of their immediate responsibilities upon hire.

The board also deliberated on the operational demands of various town facilities, including the potential workload distribution as new facilities come online. There was a suggestion to orient hiring towards a full-time position, with hopes for additional funding later.

In discussions about regional dispatch agreements, the board noted that FY26 marks the final year of the current contract, which had not been adequately monitored. There was a need to evaluate the impact of including Belter Town on cost dynamics and service quality. Concerns about communication and reporting from dispatchers were raised, emphasizing the importance of personal connections to local residents for service familiarity.

The meeting also covered infrastructure needs, such as potential HVAC solutions for the new building. Discussions included the feasibility of mini-splits for heating and cooling, reflecting on past experiences with energy contractors. The importance of aligning security upgrades with operational strategies was also touched upon, particularly concerning changes in town hall operations.

A noteworthy development was the approval of a lease amendment with Amaresco at the Cross Station Transfer Station. This amendment, which had already received necessary approvals, is expected to enhance the town’s solar energy production capabilities.

However, there was skepticism regarding Spectrum’s promises, with concerns about service reliability and the financial implications of asking residents to fund a fiber optic system.

In other matters, the board discussed liaison assignments for various town committees. The status of the Amaresco lease was reviewed. Additionally, the board acknowledged public comments about temporary custodial positions and the need for additional help during the transition to new facilities.