One of the most notable discussions revolved around the unauthorized removal of a tree valued at $8,448 by a property owner who resides part-time in both Pennsylvania and Florida. Despite the homeowner’s claims of attempting to save the tree, the commission expressed skepticism, citing photographic evidence and the absence of necessary permits for trimming or removal. The commission debated the enforcement of the city’s new ordinance concerning tree removal, with one member emphasizing the importance of upholding the ordinance while recognizing the potential financial burden on the homeowner. The commission discussed the possibility of imposing a fine and highlighted the need for better communication and education regarding tree care and regulations within the community. A proposal was made to create a flyer outlining the dos and don’ts of tree maintenance, aimed at informing part-time residents and new homeowners about the local ordinances.

The meeting also addressed a resident’s appeal to remove a tree on Hugh Street, which had been leaning for some time. Despite concerns about the tree’s condition, the commission unanimously voted against its removal, acknowledging that leaning trees are common and the tree did not pose an immediate danger.

In another discussion, the commission reviewed a situation involving trees on Maryland Avenue that had been severely pruned by a neighbor. The commission deliberated on the responsibility and potential actions to be taken, with a focus on whether the damage was reparable or if the trees should be removed. They proposed involving a tree expert to assess the damage and suggested that the responsible party might be required to pay for the evaluation. The commission also considered waiving fees for the homeowner should she decide to replace the trees.

A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the commission’s effort to combat the invasive lanternfly species. The commission reported findings of the invasive tree of heaven in the area, with plans to poison and remove infested trees. They emphasized collaboration with the West Cape May Tree Commission and other entities to manage the pest, highlighting ongoing research and data sharing as critical components of their strategy.

In a separate discussion, the commission considered an appeal from Mr. and Mrs. Wadley to remove a red cherry tree infested with borers. The commissioners had previously inspected the tree and noted a significant decline in its health, leading to a motion to approve its removal. The decision included waiving the standard $75 replacement fee due to the tree’s condition.

Additionally, the commission discussed the potential impact of construction on a large mulberry tree on New York Avenue. Despite the tree appearing healthy, there were concerns about upcoming construction, leading to a motion to deny its removal to protect the tree during the project.

The commission also tackled the logistics of a tree bank initiative, proposing an ordinance to accept cash or trees as part of the program. This initiative aims to facilitate the planting of additional trees in the city, contributing to the urban canopy and environmental sustainability.