The proposal to demolish the 1935 Mediterranean Revival Art Deco transitional-style home designed by Carlos Shuffle and Arnold Southwell sparked debate. The current owners, represented by Michael Larkin, argued for the complete demolition of the existing structure, presenting evidence of the home’s deteriorating condition, including mold, structural issues, and frequent flooding incidents in the area. Larkin emphasized the owners’ commitment to preserving the legacy of the original homeowners, Rita Star and Eore, while maximizing the property’s value for charitable contributions. Despite the concerns raised, the board ultimately decided to defer the decision to their September meeting, allowing the applicants time to explore partial preservation options.

The structural integrity of the home was a point of discussion. Structural engineer Yousef Hasham detailed extensive damage to the home, including cracking, spalling, termite damage, and foundational issues. Hasham expressed skepticism about the feasibility of elevating the home to comply with floodplain criteria, given the weaknesses in the existing structure.

Public commentary provided further insight into the community’s concerns. Roger Goldblad accused the owners of “demolition by neglect,” asserting that they had allowed the property to deteriorate intentionally to justify demolition. Other residents echoed these sentiments, warning that such a precedent could threaten the preservation of historic properties throughout Miami Beach. However, some participants, like Paul Freeman, expressed conditional support for the demolition if it resulted in responsible redevelopment and addressed potential flooding impacts.

The board’s discussion underscored the challenges of maintaining the historic character of Miami Beach while accommodating modern safety standards and development pressures. Concerns about setting a precedent for future demolition requests were central to the dialogue, with board members advocating for a case-by-case analysis to ensure each decision aligns with the broader goals of historic preservation.

In a related discussion, the board considered an application for a property on Lennox Avenue. The proposal involved modifications to a previously issued certificate of appropriateness, with plans to maintain the original character of the single-family home while allowing for necessary renovations. The board approved the application with stipulations, emphasizing the importance of preserving the architectural integrity of the historic district.

The meeting also addressed a variance request from a local restaurant seeking to extend its outdoor alcohol service hours. Despite staff recommendations to deny the variance, citing a lack of demonstrated hardship, the board approved a motion to allow the restaurant to continue its operations, recognizing its positive relationship with the neighborhood and the absence of noise complaints.

Additionally, discussions focused on the potential historic designation of the Southshore Community Center. The board debated the implications of the designation, considering the site’s historical significance and its role within the community. The board voted to direct staff to prepare a formal designation report, acknowledging the need for careful consideration of the site’s historic value amidst ongoing development pressures.